Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 8881 - 8900 of 8934
X v. United Republic of Tanzania
X v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/18/D/22/2014 Communication number s : 022/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 18 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/18/D/22/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2390/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.F. v. Switzerland
Y.F. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/885/2018 Communication number s : 885/2018 Author: Y.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Sep 2018 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/885/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3366/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y.U. v. Russia
Y.U. v. Russia RUS 13/02/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to respect for her family life Article 8 on account of the non enforcement of the judgment taken by the Moscow courts in 2008 2009 ordering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14038
Y v. Australia
Y v. Australia CCPR/C/69/D/772/1997 Communication number s : 772/1997 Author: Colin Mc Donald and Nicholas Poynder Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Australia Submission date 25 Oct 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/772/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/883/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 06 Dec 2013 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2177/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013 Communication number s : 2314/2013 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: arbitrary JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2314/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2133/en-US
Y. v. Canada,Sri Lanka
Y. v. Canada Sri Lanka CCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013 Communication number s : 2280/2013 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Canada Sri Lanka Submission date 29 Jul 2013 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1995/en-US
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
Y. v. Switzerland
Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/431/2010 Communication number s : 431/2010 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 31 Aug 2010 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/50/D/431/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/10/en-US
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania
Y v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/20/D/23/2014 Communication number s : 023/2014 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 23 Jun 2014 Date of decision 31 Aug 2018 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/20/D/23/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2511/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
YEMEN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 NULL 2014 02 24T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/YEM/CO/4 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/YEM/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b989af21-e4c6-443b-9783-77884216cc8b
YUSUPOVA v. Russia
YUSUPOVA v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46595
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar (represented by TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)) v. Libya
Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always v. Libya CCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010 Communication number s : 2006/2010 Author: Youcif Almegaryaf and Hisham Matar represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2006/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1815/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US