Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4141 - 4155 of 4155
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X, Y and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/55/D/530/2012 Communication number s : 530/2012 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Nov 2012 Date of decision 04 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/55/D/530/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2073/en-US
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X. v. Afghanistan,Sweden
X. v. Afghanistan Sweden CCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008 Communication number s : 1833/2008 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Afghanistan Sweden Submission date 26 Nov 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1833/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1390/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
YUSUPOVA v. Russia
YUSUPOVA v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46595
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US
c("Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )", "Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia (Cambodia third official country visit )")
c Document/information Follow up Information c A/HRC/36/61 A/HRC/36/61 c c 27 July 2017 27 July 2017 c Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia Cambodia third official country visit Special Rapporteur on the situation of human UNSPc("A/HRC/36/61", "A/HRC/36/61")https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f36%2f61&Lang=en
v. Switzerland
v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/147/1999 Communication number s : 147/1999 Author: Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues JUTBCAT/C/26/D/147/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1769/en-US