Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 282
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 16737/90 N/A NLD 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 270 339 348 399 403 500h 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57902
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
Chytil v. Czech Republic
Chytil v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006 Communication number s : 1452/2006 Author: Renatus J. Chytil Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1001/en-US
Concluding Observations on the 8th Periodic Report Of Mauritius
Concluding Observations on the 8th Periodic Report Of Mauritius CEDAW/C/MUS/CO/8 NULL 2018 11 14T00:00:00 CEDAW Concluding observations on the eighth periodic report of Mauritius 1.The Committee considered the eighth periodic report of Mauritius UHRICEDAW/C/MUS/CO/8https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8e7de672-61e0-48ef-92e5-0cc1a1bbcf80
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (ETS No. 112)
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons ETS No. 112 112 Strasbourg 1983 03 21T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States COEETS No. 112https://rm.coe.int/1680079529
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain
F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019 Communication number s : 3599/2019 Author: F.A.J. and B.M.R.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 14 Jan 2019 Date of decision 28 Oct 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3599/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3286/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon
Gorji Dinka v. Cameroon CCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002 Communication number s : 1134/2002 Author: Fongum Gorji Dinka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Cameroon Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 17 Mar 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1134/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1174/en-US
H.R. v. Uzbekistan
H.R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/131/D/2479/2014 Communication number s : 2479/2014 Author: H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 131 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 23 May 2014 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2479/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3204/en-US
Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Working Group to hold thirty-first session in Geneva from 5 to 16 November 2018
Working Group to Review the Human Rights Records in 14 StatesGENEVA 31 October 2018 The thirty first session of the Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group will be held in Geneva from 5 to 16 November during which the next group UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2018/11/human-rights-council-universal-periodic-review-working-group-hold-thirty
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Saudi Arabia, Senegal, the Congo and Nigeria
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 14 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Saudi Arabia Senegal the Congo and Nigeria. At the beginning of the meeting Harald Aspelund Vice President of the Human UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-saudi-arabia-senegal
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review