Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1397
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A/HRC/37/15/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Japan - Addendum - Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review
United Nations A/HRC/37/15/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 March 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty seventh session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Japan UPRA/HRC/37/15/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc3715add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-japan-addendum-views
A/HRC/47/9: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Saint Lucia
United Nations A/HRC/47/9 General Assembly Distr.: General 14 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/9https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc479-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AFET SUREYYA EREN v. Turkey
AFET SUREYYA EREN v. Turkey TUR 14/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:22:11 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / actions of security forces: Ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36701
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AKAR v. Turkey
AKAR v. Turkey TUR 21/09/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:26:10 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unjustified interference of prison authorities with the applicants correspondence in general due to the lacking clarity of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35071
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
ALEKSEY MAKAROV v. Russia
ALEKSEY MAKAROV v. Russia RUS 12/09/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 10:16:58 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Various irregularities concerning pre trial detention and lack of effective remedy. Articles 5 and 13 Other violations: length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23305
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANTONOV v. Bulgaria
ANTONOV v. Bulgaria BGR 28/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Unjustified interference due to tax authorities delay in enforcing final domestic judgments and refunding sums unduly collected. Article 1 of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55831
ARGENTINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ARGENTINA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/ARG/CO/4 NULL 2018 11 01T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/ARG/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 1 November 2018 English Original: Spanish Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights UHRIE/C.12/ARG/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/42013d19-63f8-480b-a523-5fd8e0350f96
ARMANDO IANNELLI v. Italy
ARMANDO IANNELLI v. Italy ITA 12/05/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Insufficient amount of compensation awarded in the context of a compensatory remedy available since 2001 to victims of excessively lengthy proceedings Repetitive cases EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44653
ARPS v. Croatia
ARPS v. Croatia HRV 25/01/2017 00:00:00 08/06/2017 09:26:37 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the domestic court s failure to inform her or her lawyer of the appeal hearing and the breach of the principle of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46913
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Abed Azizi v. Switzerland
Abed Azizi v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/492/2012 Communication number s : 492/2012 Author: Abed Azizi represented by counsel Mr. Urs Ebn ther Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 22 Feb 2012 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/53/D/492/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2037/en-US