Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1586
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.P. v. Kazakhstan
A.P. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/133/D/2726/2016 Communication number s : 2726/2016 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 133 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 05 Jan 2015 Date of decision 29 Oct 2021 Comment: Joint opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2726/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3154/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Abbahah v. Morocco
Abbahah v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/871/2018 Communication number s : 871/2018 Author: Sidi Abdallah Abbahah Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 09 May 2018 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/72/D/871/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3120/en-US
Adam Harun v. Switzerland
Adam Harun v. Switzerland CAT/C/65/D/758/2016 Communication number s : 758/2016 Author: Adam Harun represented by counsels Gabriella Tau et Boris Wijkstr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jul 2016 JUTBCAT/C/65/D/758/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2476/en-US
Adolf Lange v. Czech Republic
Adolf Lange v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/102/D/1586/2007 Communication number s : 1586/2007 Author: Adolf Lange Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Czech Republic Submission date 29 Jan 2007 Date of decision 13 Jul 2011 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1586/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1618/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria
Assenova Naidenova et al. v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011 Communication number s : 2073/2011 Author: Liliana Assenova Naidenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Bulgaria Submission date 25 Jun 2011 Date of decision 30 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/2073/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1464/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
Bacher v. Austria
Bacher v. Austria CRPD/C/19/D/26/2014 Communication number s : 026/2014 Author: Viktoria Bacher Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2014 Date of decision 16 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/19/D/26/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2394/en-US