Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 100
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AGROKOMPLEKS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF AGROKOMPLEKS v. UKRAINE 23465/03 LUCAS P. Y. UKR 10/6/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed applicability Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 6 1 Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved 445 40 181 180 136 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1006JUD002346503https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106636
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ALİ RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AL RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 30226/10 5506/16 BEZEN S. VALLONI L. SOYDAN A. EDEBALI Z. TUR 1/28/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6 1 Civil rights and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD003022610https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200548
CASE OF ALBERT AND LE COMPTE v. BELGIUM
CASE OF ALBERT AND LE COMPTE v. BELGIUM 7299/75 7496/76 N/A BEL 2/10/1983 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved 350 90 89 445 41 70 136 180 181 388 385 325 12 11 122 448 351 145 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0210JUD000729975 COURT PLENARY CASE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0210JUD000729975https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57422
CASE OF APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF APCOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 13463/07 POSTICA P. MDA RUS 5/30/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Positive obligations Substantive aspect the Republic of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD001346307https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-173798
CASE OF BÜLBÜL v. TURKEY
CASE OF B LB L v. TURKEY 47297/99 KANAT L. TUR 5/22/2007 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses Convention proceedings claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522JUD004729799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80593
CASE OF BEG S.P.A. v. ITALY
CASE OF BEG S.P.A. v. ITALY 5312/11 SACCUCCI A. LANA A.G. DESARIO M. ITA 5/20/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Impartial tribunal Independent tribunal Pecuniary damage claim dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0520JUD000531211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210014
CASE OF BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BELILOS v. SWITZERLAND 10328/83 N/A CHE 4/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected validity of declaration Violation of Art. 6 1 Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0429JUD001032883https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57434
CASE OF BOCHAN v. UKRAINE
CASE OF BOCHAN v. UKRAINE 7577/02 BOCHAN I. UKR 5/3/2007 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Non pecuniary damage financial award Pecuniary damage claim dismissed 343 100 369 304 445 40 136 119 180 181 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503JUD000757702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80455
CASE OF BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS 19589/92 N/A NLD 11/20/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No separate issue under P1 1 Act concerning administrative jurisdiction as to decisions of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001958992https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57953
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19178/91 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 172 174 2 175 3 289 Planning Inspectorate Executive Agency Framework Document 1992 Town and Country Planning ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57954
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA
CASE OF CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA 49429/99 N/A BGR 11/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Government s request for strike out rejected Violations of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124JUD004942999https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71299
CASE OF CAZACU v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF CAZACU v. MOLDOVA 40117/02 IABANGI L. MDA 10/23/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed application not properly submitted by the applicant but rather by a lawyer who claimed to be associated with the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023JUD004011702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82867
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 32492/96 32547/96 32548/96 33209/96 33210/96 N/A BEL 6/22/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 in respect of Mr Coeme fair hearing Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 and 6 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59194
CASE OF COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48843/99 N/A GBR 12/16/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Air Force Act 1955 as amended by the Armed Forces Act 1996 445 181 180 76 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD004884399 CASE OF COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216JUD004884399https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61549
CASE OF CROMPTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CROMPTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 42509/05 LEVYS SOLICITORS GBR 10/27/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 445 13 41 180 181 406 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD004250905 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF CROMPTON v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD004250905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-95364