Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 160
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A.M.B. v. Ecuador
A.M.B. v. Ecuador E/C.12/58/D/3/2014 Communication number s : 003/2014 Author: A.M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Ecuador Submission date Date of decision 20 Jun 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBE/C.12/58/D/3/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2137/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 5/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144139
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF GLOR v. SWITZERLAND 13444/04 VON PLANTA STING D. CHE 4/30/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 14 8 Sections 2 et 4 paragraph 1 a of the federal military service exemption tax Act Sections 13 paragraph 2 a and 42 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD001344404https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92525
CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
CASE OF GU MUNDUR ANDRI STR SSON v. ICELAND 26374/18 VILHJ LMSSON V.H. ISL 12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Tribunal established by law Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD002637418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206582
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTSÁG v. HUNGARY
CASE OF MAGYAR HELSINKI BIZOTTS G v. HUNGARY 18030/11 FAZEKAS T. HUN 11/8/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1108JUD001803011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167828
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA 29474/09 KUKAITIS M. LTU 11/27/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Procedural aspect Code of Correctional Works Internal Regulations of Correctional Institutions 293 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD002947409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114770
CASE OF VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA 35343/05 VILCINSKAS S. LTU 10/20/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity Criminal offence Article 7 2 Criminal offence Pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020JUD003534305https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158290
Deisl v. Austria
Deisl v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002 Communication number s : 1060/2002 Author: Franz and Maria Deisl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 17 Sep 2001 Date of decision 27 Jul 2004 Comment: The authors asked JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1128/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcome of Bahrain
MORNING 24 March 2023 Council Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bahrain. It also concluded the general debate on agenda item five on human UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcome-bahrain
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Ecuador, Tunisia, and Morocco
AFTERNOON 24 March 2023 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Ecuador Tunisia and Morocco. The Council adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Ecuador. The Vice President said that out of 174 UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-ecuador-tunisia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bahrain, Ecuador and Tunisia
Human Rights CouncilMORNING AND MIDDAY 19 September 2012Concludes Interactive Dialogue with Human Rights Council Advisory Committee and Starts Debate on Human Rights Bodies and MechanismsThe Human Rights Council today adopted the outcome of the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bahrain