Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2101 - 2109 of 2109
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/10/14/Add.2 from 26 May 2008 to 30 May 2008 19 February 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United Kingdom of Great UNSPA/HRC/10/14/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f10%2f14%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.2 from 28 August 2006 to 1 September 2006 23 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ecuador UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.2 from 12 October 2015 to 16 October 2015 8 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Belgium United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
Z.B. v. Hungary
Z.B. v. Hungary CCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016 Communication number s : 2768/2016 Author: Z.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Hungary Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2538/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011 Communication number s : 2049/2011 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr 2011 Date of decision 18 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2049/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1866/en-US
Zapescu v. Republic of Moldova
Zapescu v. Republic of Moldova CERD/C/103/D/60/2016 Communication number s : 60/2016 Author: Grigore Zapescu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 30 Jun 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2021 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/103/D/60/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3023/en-US
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Morocco
v. Morocco CAT/C/52/D/372/2009 Communication number s : 372/2009 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Morocco Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/372/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1831/en-US