Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6381 - 6400 of 7668
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Pustovoit v. Ukraine
Pustovoit v. Ukraine CCPR/C/110/D/1405/2005 Communication number s : 1405/2005 Author: Mikhail Pustovoit Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Ukraine Submission date 21 Apr 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1405/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1800/en-US
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US
QUINN v. Ireland
QUINN v. Ireland IRL 21/03/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 11:15:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the right to remain silent and not to incriminate oneself following suspicion of having committed terrorist EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3239
QUINN v. the United Kingdom
QUINN v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/04/1998 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to denial of access to legal advice during the first 24 to 48 hours of detention in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2398
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
Quispe Roque v. Peru
Quispe Roque v. Peru CCPR/C/85/D/1125/2002 Communication number s : 1125/2002 Author: Jorge Luis Quispe Roque Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Peru Submission date 17 Jul 2002 Date of decision 21 Oct 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1125/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1234/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US
R.H.M. v. Denmark
R.H.M. v. Denmark CRC/C/86/D/83/2019 Communication number s : 83/2019 Author: R.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Apr 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of Committee JUTBCRC/C/86/D/83/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3565/en-US
R.H. v. Sweden
R.H. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/750/2016 Communication number s : 750/2016 Author: R.H. represented by counsels Mathias Blomberg and Beatrice Rohdin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 19 May 2016 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2732/en-US
R.L.A.W. v. Netherlands
R.L.A.W. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/40/D/372/1989 Communication number s : 372/1989 Author: R.L.A.W. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 40 Country Netherlands Submission date 05 Jul 1989 Date of decision 02 Nov 1990 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/40/D/372/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/601/en-US
R.M. v. Sweden
R.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/59/D/610/2014 Communication number s : 610/2014 Author: R.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Jun 2014 Date of decision 30 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/610/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2146/en-US
R.M. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.M. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/49/D/384/1989 Communication number s : 384/1989 Author: R.M. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 16 Jul 1989 Date of decision 29 Oct 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/384/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/643/en-US
R.R. v. Italy
R.R. v. Italy ITA 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction in absentia without the applicant being given any opportunity to defend himself in person and to set out his version of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44483
R.S.A.A. v. Denmark
R.S.A.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/86/2015 Communication number s : 086/2015 Author: R.S.A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/86/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2654/en-US
R.S. et al. v. Switzerland
R.S. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/482/2011 Communication number s : 482/2011 Author: R.S. et al. represented by Ms. Karine Povlakic Service d aide juridique aux exil e s SAJE Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland JUTBCAT/C/53/D/482/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2036/en-US
R.S. v. Austria
R.S. v. Austria CAT/C/28/D/111/1998 Communication number s : 111/1998 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 28 Country Austria Submission date 16 Apr 1997 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/28/D/111/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/180/en-US
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/684/1996 Communication number s : 684/1996 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Mar 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 2002 Comment: The Committee JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/684/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/954/en-US
RACHDAD v. France
RACHDAD v. France FRA 13/02/2004 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to a conviction by the court of appeal to an increased prison term and permanent expulsion EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33231
RADULESCU v. Romania
RADULESCU v. Romania ROU 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s conviction by the a court of appeal in 2012 without a renewed hearing of the witnesses although the first instance court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55185