Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6881 - 6900 of 7668
S.M.R. and M.M.R. v. Sweden
S.M.R. and M.M.R. v. Sweden CAT/C/22/D/103/1998 Communication number s : 103/1998 Author: S.M.R. and M.M.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Sweden Submission date 05 Nov 1997 Date of decision 05 May 1999 Comment: exact date of JUTBCAT/C/22/D/103/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/250/en-US
S.M. v. Switzerland
S.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/49/D/406/2009 Communication number s : 406/2009 Author: S.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Nov 2009 Date of decision 23 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/406/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/22/en-US
S.R. v. Lithuania
S.R. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/132/D/3313/2019 Communication number s : 3313/2019 Author: S.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Lithuania Submission date 23 Nov 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3313/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3172/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
S.V. v. Belarus
S.V. v. Belarus CCPR/C/116/D/2047/2011 Communication number s : 2047/2011 Author: S.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Belarus Submission date 24 Jan 2011 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2047/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2109/en-US
S.Y. v. Netherlands
S.Y. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/123/D/2392/2014 Communication number s : 2392/2014 Author: S.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Jan 2014 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2392/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2523/en-US
SABANOVIC v. Montenegro and Serbia
SABANOVIC v. Montenegro and Serbia MNE 31/08/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction to suspended prison term for defamation of a public official water inspector in a matter of public interest amounting to an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11154
SABER AND BOUGHASSAL v. Spain
SABER AND BOUGHASSAL v. Spain ESP 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate and unjustified interference due to expulsion orders issued against Moroccan nationals and long term EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51887
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/VCT/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 03 13T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/VCT/CO/2 3 Convention on the Distr.: General 13 March 2017 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the UHRICRC/C/VCT/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c5227570-4e41-40e4-a643-22b4be068a1a
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/ADD.1 NULL 2019 05 09T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/Add.1 International Covenant on Distr.: General 9 May 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human UHRICCPR/C/VCT/CO/2/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/eea9b47b-fdc3-4120-95ce-1ddbf600df74
SALDUZ v. Turkey
SALDUZ v. Turkey TUR 27/11/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a lawyer during questioning at police stations and use of the statements made as evidence in proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37270
SALMANOV v. Slovakia
SALMANOV v. Slovakia SVK 20/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: The case concerns the unlawful detention of the applicant ordered by the Supreme Court in 2014 subsequent to his first instance conviction because of non compliance with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60245
SALOV v. Ukraine
SALOV v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression / protection of rights in detention / access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction for disseminating false information about a candidate for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31310
SAMOA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SAMOA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/WSM/CO/2 4 NULL 2016 07 12T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/WSM/CO/2 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 12 July 2016 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/WSM/CO/2-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/379bf361-040a-4d68-aa6f-efa24c0d0e34
SANNINO v. Italy
SANNINO v. Italy ITA 13/09/2006 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to lacking effective defence or representation of the applicant accused of fraudulent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44493
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain
SAQUETTI IGLESIAS v. Spain ESP 30/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: Right of appeal in criminal matters: Inability of the applicant to have a higher court review the imposition of a fine for an offence which although classified as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56051
SARAR v. Turkey
SARAR v. Turkey TUR 15/06/2021 00:00:00 18/06/2021 16:11:30 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings on account of the lack of legal assistance while in police custody as a result of the statutory ban applicable to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57867
SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
SARKIZOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Automatic ban to leave the country on the ground of a lacking rehabilitation fallowing a criminal conviction. The bans remained in force not EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14471
SATIK v. Turkey (no 2)
SATIK v. Turkey no 2 TUR 08/10/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: Freedom of expression and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for expressing non violent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36778
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria
SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. Austria AUT 13/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the first applicant s conviction to a suspended fine and the media company s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-915