Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 2868
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea
Andrea Vandom v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013 Communication number s : 2273/2013 Author: Andrea Vandom Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 07 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2273/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2496/en-US
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus
Andrei Sannikov v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012 Communication number s : 2212/2012 Author: Andrei Sannikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Jul 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2212/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2488/en-US
Andrei Strizhak v. Belarus
Andrei Strizhak v. Belarus CCPR/C/124/D/2260/2013 Communication number s : 2260/2013 Author: Andrei Strizhak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Nov 2012 Date of decision 01 Nov 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2260/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2556/en-US
Androsov v. Kazakhstan
Androsov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/121/D/2403/2014 Communication number s : 2403/2014 Author: Andrei Androsov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 20 Jan 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2403/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3519/en-US
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013 Communication number s : 2252/2013 Author: Annadurdy Khadzhiyev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 09 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2480/en-US
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Arkauz Arana v. France
Arkauz Arana v. France CAT/C/23/D/63/1997 Communication number s : 063/1997 Author: Josu Arkauz Arana Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 1996 Date of decision 09 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/23/D/63/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/211/en-US
Arshidin Israil v. China,Kazakhstan
Arshidin Israil v. China Kazakhstan CCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011 Communication number s : 2024/2011 Author: Arshidin Israil Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country China Kazakhstan Submission date 28 Jan 2011 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/2024/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1235/en-US
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan
Arslan Dawletow v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013 Communication number s : 2316/2013 Author: Arslan Dawletow Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 01 May 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2316/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3101/en-US
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan
Arutyunyan v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/80/D/917/2000 Communication number s : 917/2000 Author: Karina Arutyunyan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Mar 2000 Date of decision 29 Mar 2004 Comment: Under rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/917/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1099/en-US
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014 Communication number s : 2508/2014 Author: Dodanpegamage Asantha Aravinda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 31 Oct 2011 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3197/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands
B.P. and P.B. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017 Communication number s : 2974/2017 Author: B.P. and P.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Oct 2016 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2974/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2866/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2022 08 03T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 August 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/18e467c9-deff-4ae2-b9f4-cd401c8e7df1
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2019 08 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BGD/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 26 August 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d1876765-1efb-46ea-9ec1-79ca133076db
BARBADOS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BARBADOS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BRB/CO/2 NULL 2017 03 03T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BRB/CO/2 Convention on the Distr.: General 3 March 2017 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/BRB/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1f79e116-c439-40df-b958-e5f92465100c