Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 88
A/HRC/47/11: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Oman
United Nations A/HRC/47/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/11https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4711-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-oman
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia
Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015 Communication number s : 2537/2015 Author: Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 11 Aug 2014 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2501/en-US
CASE OF X v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF X v. SWITZERLAND 16744/14 BOSONNET M. CHE 1/26/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Sri Lanka 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD001674414 THIRD SECTION CASE OF X v. SWITZERLAND Application no. 16744/14 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD001674414https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170467
D.M. v. Australia
D.M. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/595/2014 Communication number s : 595/2014 Author: D.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2014 Date of decision 08 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/595/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3013/en-US
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
G.W.J. v. Australia
G.W.J. v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/856/2017 Communication number s : 856/2017 Author: G.W.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 07 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/856/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3347/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Sweden, Grenada, Turkey and Kiribati
29 September 2020 Begins General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Sweden Grenada Turkey and Kiribati. It also started the general debate on human rights UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/general-comments-and-recommendations/2020/09/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom, India and Brazil
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom India and Brazil.Karen Pierce Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-kingdom
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
Human Rights Council holds general debate on universal periodic review
MORNING GENEVA 27 June 2016 The Human Rights Council this morning held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the general debate speakers underlined that the Universal Periodic Review should be conducted in an objective non biased UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2016/06/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights
Report to HRC A/HRC/40/57/Add.2 from 3 September 2018 to 11 September 2018 17 January 2019 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights UNSPA/HRC/40/57/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f40%2f57%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
J.X.F.P. v. Australia
J.X.F.P. v. Australia CAT/C/75/D/770/2016 Communication number s : 770/2016 Author: J.X.F.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/770/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3739/en-US
K.N. v. Australia
K.N. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/649/2015 Communication number s : 649/2015 Author: K.N. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 06 Jan 2015 Date of decision 23 Nov 2016 JUTBCAT/C/59/D/649/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2201/en-US
L.P. v. Australia
L.P. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/666/2015 Communication number s : 666/2015 Author: L.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 19 Mar 2015 Date of decision 01 Dec 2016 Comment: Views non violation Substantive JUTBCAT/C/59/D/666/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2168/en-US
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012 Communication number s : 2136/2012 Author: M.M.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date Date of decision Comment: The text of an individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2136/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1674/en-US
Manuel v. New Zealand
Manuel v. New Zealand CCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005 Communication number s : 1385/2005 Author: Benjamin Manuel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country New Zealand Submission date 06 Apr 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1385/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1379/en-US
Nasir v. Australia
Nasir v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012 Communication number s : 2229/2012 Author: Nasir Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2012 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3091/en-US