Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1961 - 1969 of 1969
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/18/32/Add.3 from 10 November 2010 to 19 November 2010 4 July 2011 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination South Africa United UNSPA/HRC/18/32/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f18%2f32%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/15/25/Add.3 from 20 July 2009 to 24 July 2009 15 June 2010 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination United States of America UNSPA/HRC/15/25/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f15%2f25%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/45/9/Add.1 from 13 May 2019 to 17 May 2019 7 July 2020 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Switzerland United Nations UNSPA/HRC/45/9/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f45%2f9%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date 16 Feb 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2638/en-US
X. v. Timor-Leste
X. v. Timor Leste CEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015 Communication number s : 088/2015 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Timor Leste Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/88/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2428/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany
Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany CERD/C/72/D/38/2006 Communication number s : 038/2006 Author: Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Germany Submission date 29 Aug 2006 JUTBCERD/C/72/D/38/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1732/en-US
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007 Communication number s : 1585/2007 Author: Batyrova Zoolfia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 Jul 2007 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1521/en-US