Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2826
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
ALAKBAROV AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
ALAKBAROV AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Various irregularities concerning detention on remand and its excessive length. Article 5 Other violation: Interference with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57755
ALAY v. Turkey
ALAY v. Turkey TUR 06/06/2007 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness transfer to gendarmerie premises for further interrogation after being placed in pre trial detention on the basis of Decree Law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26850
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey
ALPARSLAN ALTAN v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2019 00:00:00 25/09/2019 10:40:24 Case Description: The Alparslan Altan group of cases concerns violations of the right to liberty and security in the immediate aftermath of the coup attempt on 15 July 2016 due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52779
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Aster v. Czech Republic
Aster v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007 Communication number s : 1575/2007 Author: Herman Aster Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Feb 2007 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1575/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1478/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia
BEZRUKOVY v. Russia RUS 10/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns unjustified extension of an expired time limit to appeal in civil proceedings to which the applicants were a party and the subsequent quashing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13691
Bagale v. Nepal
Bagale v. Nepal CCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016 Communication number s : 2777/2016 Author: Hom Bahadur Bagale Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Nepal Submission date 17 Dec 2015 Date of decision 02 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2777/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3277/en-US
Berzig v. Algeria
Berzig v. Algeria CCPR/C/103/D/1781/2008 Communication number s : 1781/2008 Author: Fatma Zohra Berzig Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Feb 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1781/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1645/en-US
CARAMAN v. the Republic of Moldova
CARAMAN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/09/2020 00:00:00 21/09/2020 17:50:21 Case Description: Functioning of justice / protection of property rights / lack of a remedy: State s failure to enforce final domestic judgments awarding the applicants social EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55893
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO 37571/05 RADULOVIC P. MNE 3/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116972
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY
CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY 9042/04 BERGE H. NOR 5/31/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 445 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. AND E. RIIS v. NORWAY Application no. 9042/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 31 May 2007 FINAL ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD000904204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-80744
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. LATVIA
CASE OF A B AND C v. LATVIA 30808/11 MOLA I. LVA 3/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003080811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161741
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA 1439/06 BELINSKAYA M. RUS 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Article 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 350 90 193 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD000143906https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100964
CASE OF A.B. v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF A.B. v. SLOVAKIA 41784/98 SVK 3/4/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to refusal to appoint a lawyer No violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to alleged arbitrariness of decision Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD004178498https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60965