Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 941 - 960 of 4370
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM 18052/11 HISSEL V. VERSIE B. BEL 7/18/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0718JUD001805211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175846
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM
CASE OF ROOMAN v. BELGIUM 18052/11 HISSEL V. VERSIE B. BEL 1/31/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0131JUD001805211https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-189902
CASE OF ROSINSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF ROSINSKI v. POLAND 17373/02 N/A POL 7/17/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed ratione temporis ratione materiae non exhaustion of domestic remedies Non pecuniary damage financial award Violation of P1 1 Local Planning Acts 1984 1994 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD001737302https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81737
CASE OF ROTHE v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ROTHE v. AUSTRIA 6490/07 WINDHAGER M. AUT 12/4/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life 451 429 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD000649007 FIRST SECTION CASE OF ROTHE v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204JUD000649007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115005
CASE OF ROUSK v. SWEDEN
CASE OF ROUSK v. SWEDEN 27183/04 THORNHAMMAR J. SWE 7/25/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0725JUD002718304https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-123422
CASE OF RUMMI v. ESTONIA
CASE OF RUMMI v. ESTONIA 63362/09 SUSI M. EST 1/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Public hearing Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD006336209https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-150306
CASE OF RUOKANEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
CASE OF RUOKANEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND 45130/06 RYTI R. FIN 4/6/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 Articles 9 and 10 of the Penal Code Section 39 of the Freedom of the Press Act Chapter 5 sections 1 and 6 of the Tort Liability Act 149 148 265 579 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD004513006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98062
CASE OF RYLLO v. ITALY
CASE OF RYLLO v. ITALY 25834/94 N/A ITA 9/2/1997 12:00:00 AM Art. 6 inapplicable 445 41 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002583494 SPURIO GALLO ZILAGHE LAGHI VIERO ORLANDINI AND RYLLO CASES CASE OF RYLLO v. ITALY 35/1996/654/839 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 September ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0902JUD002583494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58187
CASE OF S.A. DANGEVILLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF S.A. DANGEVILLE v. FRANCE 36677/97 N/A FRA 4/16/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416JUD003667797https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60432
CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE
CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE 43835/11 SHARMA S. RAMBY DE MELLO M. MUMAN T. SINGH JUSS S. FRA 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Actio popularis Preliminary objections dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004383511https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145466
CASE OF S.A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF S.A. v. THE NETHERLANDS 49773/15 DIJKMAN G.J. NLD 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Sudan No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004977315https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202705
CASE OF S. AND MARPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF S. AND MARPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 30562/04 30566/04 MAMHY P. of Messrs HOWELLS GBR 12/4/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD003056204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90051
CASE OF S.C. FIERCOLECT IMPEX S.R.L. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF S.C. FIERCOLECT IMPEX S.R.L. v. ROMANIA 26429/07 CHIRITA R. ROU 12/13/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213JUD002642907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-169468
CASE OF S.C. SERVICE BENZ COM S.R.L. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF S.C. SERVICE BENZ COM S.R.L. v. ROMANIA 58045/11 MARZAVAN M.E. ROU 7/4/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions 369 304 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD005804511https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174993
CASE OF SÖDERMAN v. SWEDEN
CASE OF S DERMAN v. SWEDEN 5786/08 SODERGREN J. LEWIS K. CRAFOORD C. SWE 11/12/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for private life Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD000578608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-128043
CASE OF S.H. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF S.H. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 57813/00 KINZ H.F. WEH W.L. AUT 11/3/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 8 Section 3 1 and section 3 2 of the Artificial Procreation Act 451 429 425 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD005781300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107325
CASE OF S.H.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF S.H.H. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 60367/10 DUNCAN LEWIS SOLICITORS SYMES M. GBR 1/29/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan National Disability Action Plan 2008 2011 350 620 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129JUD006036710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116123
CASE OF SÜHEYLA AYDIN v. TURKEY
CASE OF S HEYLA AYDIN v. TURKEY 25660/94 BOYLE KEVIN HAMPSON FRANCOISE TUR 5/24/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 38 Examination of the case ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524JUD002566094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69139
CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIA
CASE OF S.M. v. CROATIA 60561/14 BEZBRADICA JELAVI S. HRV 6/25/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 4 Prohibition of slavery and forced labour Article 4 Positive obligations Effective investigation Article 4 1 Trafficking in human beings Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD006056114https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203503
CASE OF SİNİM v. TURKEY
CASE OF S N M v. TURKEY 9441/10 KANAR E. TUR 6/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 a Ratione materiae Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD000944110https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174064