Search

Data source

EU member states

Other countries

Keywords

Tags

Displaying 141 - 160 of 6287

Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka

Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014 Communication number s : 2508/2014 Author: Dodanpegamage Asantha Aravinda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 31 Oct 2011 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3197/en-US

Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye

Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US

Avadanov v. Azerbaijan

Avadanov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007 Communication number s : 1633/2007 Author: Khilal Avadanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 31 Jul 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1591/en-US

Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden,Türkiye

Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden T rkiye CAT/C/45/D/373/2009 Communication number s : 373/2009 Author: Munir Aytulun and Lilav Guclu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Sweden T rkiye Submission date 27 Jan 2009 Date of decision 19 Nov JUTBCAT/C/45/D/373/2009
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/61/en-US

B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Slovenia

B.K.M. LOJISTIK TASIMACILIK TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI v. Slovenia SVN 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful and disproportionate interference due to the confiscation of a transport company s lorry in the EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46761

B.K. v. Norway

B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US

B.M.S. v. Sweden

B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/437/2010 Communication number s : 437/2010 Author: B.M.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 10 Aug 2010 Date of decision 12 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/437/2010
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/17/en-US

B. M. v. Switzerland

B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US

B.S.S. v. Canada

B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US

B.S. v. Canada

B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US

B.S. v. Spain

B.S. v. Spain ESP 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 09:41:36 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and discrimination: Lack of effective investigation into allegations of racially motivated ill treatment inflicted by police agents. Article 3 EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5760

B.V. v. Belgium

B.V. v. Belgium BEL 02/08/2017 00:00:00 11/09/2017 09:42:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of serious and thorough investigations carried after the applicant had lodged a criminal complaint alleging rape and indecent assault. EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47595

B.Z. et al. v. Albania

B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016
https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US

BAARS v. the Netherlands

BAARS v. the Netherlands NLD 28/01/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the denial of costs and compensation for pre trial detention after EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4499

BAISCHER v. Austria

BAISCHER v. Austria AUT 20/03/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair administrative criminal proceedings due to the lack of a public hearing before an Independent Administrative Panel for EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-845

BAJIC v. Croatia

BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133

BAK v. Poland

BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594

BAKLANOV v. Russia

BAKLANOV v. Russia RUS 30/11/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to base confiscatory measures on a precise legal provision Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Status of EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27554

BALAJEVS v. Latvia

BALAJEVS v. Latvia LVA 28/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Ill treatment of prisoners by escort officers in the premises of the Riga Regional Court in and lack of effective investigations. Article 3 EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12668

BALASOIU v. Romania (no. 2)

BALASOIU v. Romania no. 2 ROU 20/03/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to protect the applicant s reputation following a police report describing her in unfavorable terms added EXEC
https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16741