Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
A.P. v. Italy
A.P. v. Italy CCPR/C/31/D/204/1986 Communication number s : 204/1986 Author: A.P. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 31 Country Italy Submission date 16 Jan 1986 Date of decision 02 Nov 1987 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/31/D/204/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/344/en-US
G.R. v. Australia
G.R. v. Australia CAT/C/57/D/605/2014 Communication number s : 605/2014 Author: G.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2014 Date of decision 13 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/605/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3008/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/768/2016 Communication number s : 768/2016 Author: Jean Baptiste Mugimba represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2578/en-US
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/771/2016 Communication number s : 771/2016 Author: Jean Claude Iyamuremye represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2579/en-US
Judge v. Canada
Judge v. Canada CCPR/C/78/D/829/1998 Communication number s : 829/1998 Author: Roger Judge Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Canada Submission date 07 Aug 1998 Date of decision 05 Aug 2003 Comment: The exact date of the JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/829/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1063/en-US
L.M. v. Canada
L.M. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/488/2012 Communication number s : 488/2012 Author: L.M. represented by counsel Johanne Doyon and Philippe Larochelle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2012 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/488/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2735/en-US
Maya Nepal v. Nepal
Maya Nepal v. Nepal CCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015 Communication number s : 2615/2015 Author: Devi Maya Nepal Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Nepal Submission date 24 Mar 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2615/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3187/en-US
Roitman Rosenmann v. Spain
Roitman Rosenmann v. Spain CAT/C/28/D/176/2000 Communication number s : 176/2000 Author: Marcos Roitman Rosenmann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 28 Country Spain Submission date 25 Oct 2000 Date of decision 30 Apr 2002 Comment: An JUTBCAT/C/28/D/176/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/191/en-US
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/74/D/935/2019 Communication number s : 935/2019 Author: S.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jun 2019 Date of decision 23 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/935/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3612/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
X v. Australia
X v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/789/2016 Communication number s : 789/2016 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 21 Oct 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/789/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3356/en-US