Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5561 - 5580 of 6576
Jean Emmanuel Kandem Foumbi v. Cameroon
Jean Emmanuel Kandem Foumbi v. Cameroon CCPR/C/112/D/2325/2013 Communication number s : 2325/2013 Author: Jean Emmanuel Kandem Foumbi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country Cameroon Submission date 18 Nov 2013 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2325/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1942/en-US
Jean Ndagijimana v. Burundi
Jean Ndagijimana v. Burundi CAT/C/62/D/496/2012 Communication number s : 496/2012 Author: Jean Ndagijimana represented by TRIAL Track Impunity Always Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Burundi Submission date 09 Mar 2012 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/496/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2415/en-US
Jenny v. Austria
Jenny v. Austria CCPR/C/93/D/1437/2005 Communication number s : 1437/2005 Author: Wolfgang Jenny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Austria Submission date 08 Aug 2005 Date of decision 09 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1437/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1408/en-US
Jiménez Vaca v. Colombia
Jim nez Vaca v. Colombia CCPR/C/74/D/859/1999 Communication number s : 859/1999 Author: Luis Asdr bal Jim nez Vaca Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Colombia Submission date 04 Dec 1998 Date of decision 25 Mar 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/859/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/972/en-US
Jit Man Basnet and Top Bahadur Basnet v. Nepal
Jit Man Basnet and Top Bahadur Basnet v. Nepal CCPR/C/112/D/2051/2011 Communication number s : 2051/2011 Author: Jit Man Basnet and Top Bahadur Basnet represented by counsel Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2051/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1904/en-US
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand
John Alfred Vogel v. New Zealand CAT/C/62/D/672/2015 Communication number s : 672/2015 Author: John Alfred Vogel represented by counsel Tony Ellis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country New Zealand Submission date 05 Jan 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/62/D/672/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2404/en-US
Jong-bum Bae et al. v. Republic of Korea
Jong bum Bae et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/128/D/2846/2016 Communication number s : 2846/2016 Author: Jong bum Bae et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Sep 2016 Date of decision 13 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2846/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2831/en-US
Juma Nazarov et al. v. Turkmenistan
Juma Nazarov et al. v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/126/D/2302/2013 Communication number s : 2302/2013 Author: Juma Nazarov et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 28 Aug 2013 Date of decision 25 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2302/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2797/en-US
K.E.R. v. Canada
K.E.R. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012 Communication number s : 2196/2012 Author: K.E.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2312/en-US
K.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
K.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 06/11/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Refusal of authorities to allow eight women of Roma ethnic origin to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8547
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium CRC/C/89/D/73/2019 Communication number s : 73/2019 Author: K.K. and R.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belgium Submission date 30 Jan 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/89/D/73/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2995/en-US
K.M. v. Belarus
K.M. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2199/2012 Communication number s : 2199/2012 Author: K.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Sep 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2199/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2383/en-US
K.S. v. Poland
K.S. v. Poland CEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018 Communication number s : 128/2018 Author: K.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Poland Submission date 11 Apr 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3034/en-US
K.U. v. Finland
K.U. v. Finland FIN 02/03/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of effective protection due to the fact that the identity of the person who had posted an advertisement of a sexual nature about a minor could EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4902
KABILI v. Greece
KABILI v. Greece GRC 31/10/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 15:44:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence on account of the reasoning of judicial decisions rejecting the applicants claims EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15170
KAEMENA v. Germany
KAEMENA v. Germany DEU 22/04/2009 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings ending with the imposition of a life sentence in particular before the Federal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38466
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. Romania
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 26/07/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Discriminatory attacks and ensuing judicial proceedings: Destruction of houses of Roma villagers by local population the poor living conditions of the victims and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16105
KALKAN v. Turkey
KALKAN v. Turkey TUR 05/12/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28753
KAMBANGU v. Lithuania
KAMBANGU v. Lithuania LTU 19/07/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful deprivation of liberty during the applicant s stay in the Aliens Registration Centre and lack of an effective review in this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4201