Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5661 - 5680 of 6576
LEPOJIC v. Serbia
LEPOJIC v. Serbia SRB 31/03/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:00:18 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for defamation and subsequent ordering to pay substantial damages to the plaintiff. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9103
LIAKOPOULOU v. Greece
LIAKOPOULOU v. Greece GRC 23/10/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to an excessively formalistic approach which had prevented the applicants from having the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22350
LIBLIK AND OTHERS v. Estonia
LIBLIK AND OTHERS v. Estonia EST 07/10/2019 00:00:00 23/10/2019 11:45:51 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the lack of sufficient reasoning of the preliminary investigation judges and prosecutors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54071
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden
LINDSTRAND PARTNERS ADVOKATBYRA AB v. Sweden SWE 29/05/2017 00:00:00 20/06/2017 16:33:38 Case Description: Lack of an effective remedy in the context of protection of private and family life: Denial of locus standi in proceedings concerning the Tax Agency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47071
LIVANOS v. Greece
LIVANOS v. Greece GRC 16/05/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22244
LOGICA - MOVEIS DE ORGANIZACAO, LDA v. Portugal
LOGICA MOVEIS DE ORGANIZACAO LDA v. Portugal PRT 19/12/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9551
LOMASEITA OY AND OTHERS v. Finland
LOMASEITA OY AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 05/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms as the applicants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4854
LOMBARDO AND OTHERS v. Malta
LOMBARDO AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 24/07/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to a judgment in civil libel proceedings concerning the publication of an article on a road building EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4085
LOMBARDO v. Italy
LOMBARDO v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43672
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands
LORSE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands NLD 04/05/2003 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Conditions of detention: Detention regime in a maximum security prison EBI including very stringent security measures the combination of which with routine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4525
LUCKY DEV v. Sweden
LUCKY DEV v. Sweden SWE 27/02/2015 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Conviction in tax proceedings despite an acquittal in criminal proceedings for the same offence. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2194
LUNTRE v. the Republic of Moldova
LUNTRE v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 15/09/2004 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure or substantial delay in the enforcement of final domestic judicial decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6688
LUTZ v. France
LUTZ v. France FRA 26/06/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before administrative courts and lack of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33155
LYSAK v. Poland
LYSAK v. Poland POL 07/01/2022 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: The merchandise belonging to the applicant have been retained since February 2013 for the purpose of criminal proceedings into allegations of trading counterfeit clothes without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59381
Laaroussi v. Morocco
Laaroussi v. Morocco CAT/C/74/D/891/2018 Communication number s : 891/2018 Author: Abdel Jalil Laaroussi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Morocco Submission date 19 Oct 2018 Date of decision 15 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/74/D/891/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3615/en-US
Lacko v. Slovakia
Lacko v. Slovakia CERD/C/59/D/11/1998 Communication number s : 011/1998 Author: Miroslav Lacko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Slovakia Submission date 21 Oct 1998 Date of decision 09 Aug 2001 Comment: exact date of JUTBCERD/C/59/D/11/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1748/en-US
Lantsova v. Russian Federation
Lantsova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/74/D/763/1997 Communication number s : 763/1997 Author: Yekaterina Pavlovna Lantsova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Russian Federation Submission date 22 Jul 1996 Date of decision 26 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/763/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/740/en-US
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France CERD/C/89/D/52/2012 Communication number s : 052/2012 Author: Laurent Gabre Gabaroum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country France Submission date 19 Mar 2012 Date of decision 10 May 2016 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/89/D/52/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2175/en-US
Lee v. Republic of Korea
Lee v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/84/D/1119/2002 Communication number s : 1119/2002 Author: Jeong Eun Lee Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 23 Aug 2002 Date of decision 20 Jul 2005 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1119/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1187/en-US
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus
Leonid Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/115/D/2016/2010 Communication number s : 2016/2010 Author: Leonid Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Belarus Submission date 23 May 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2016/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2028/en-US