Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5701 - 5720 of 6576
M.Z. v. Belgium
M.Z. v. Belgium CAT/C/67/D/813/2017 Communication number s : 813/2017 Author: M.Z. represented by counsel Wolfgang Kaleck European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Belgium JUTBCAT/C/67/D/813/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2627/en-US
Múnera López et al v. Colombia
M nera L pez et al v. Colombia CCPR/C/128/D/3076/2017 Communication number s : 3076/2017 Author: Isabel L pez Mart nez Gladys Cecilia Rinc n de M nera Nad n Jos M nera Rinc n Adolfo M nera Rinc n Gladys Cristina M nera Rinc n Mar a Camila M nera Cepeda JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3076/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2820/en-US
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MACCIOCCHI v. Italy
MACCIOCCHI v. Italy ITA 19/10/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43774
MADER v. Croatia
MADER v. Croatia HRV 21/09/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and functioning of justice: Inhuman treatment inter alia by sleep and food deprivation while in police custody in the absence of any official EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10103
MAJEWSKI v. Poland
MAJEWSKI v. Poland POL 11/01/2006 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20588
MAKEDONSKI v. Bulgaria
MAKEDONSKI v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Freedom of movement access to an efficient functioning of justice and remedy: Prohibition over a lengthy period to leave the country without periodic reassessments of its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14431
MALAHOV v. the Republic of Moldova
MALAHOV v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 12/11/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court in labour proceedings due to the domestic courts refusal to waive the obligation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7530
MALAWI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MALAWI: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/MWI/CO/1 NULL 2022 11 28T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/MWI/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 9 December 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/MWI/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9a7c9e7e-7f81-46ec-bac5-469e2637bed1
MAMERE v. France
MAMERE v. France FRA 07/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction of a politician in criminal proceedings to pay a fine as well as damages for statements he made during a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33029
MARIJA BOZIC v. Croatia
MARIJA BOZIC v. Croatia HRV 24/07/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to deprivation of an agricultural entrepreneur of her old age pension for eleven years because of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10117
MARINOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
MARINOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: These cases concern the disproportionate interference with the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions in criminal proceedings between 2004 and 2011 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39477
MARONEK v. Slovakia
MARONEK v. Slovakia SVK 19/07/2001 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of heavy pecuniary sanctions imposed in defamation proceedings for a public statement made concerning the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7821
MARRAZZO v. Italy
MARRAZZO v. Italy ITA 28/06/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43321
MARTINELLI & POLETTI v. Italy
MARTINELLI POLETTI v. Italy ITA 11/01/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42779
MASTROENI v. Italy
MASTROENI v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43546
MATELLY v. France
MATELLY v. France FRA 02/01/2015 00:00:00 21/11/2016 08:52:53 Case Description: Freedom of association: Blanket ban on the right to form or join trade unions on the basis of Defence Code provisions on members of the gendarmerie and military personnel by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39845
MATHEUS v. France
MATHEUS v. France FRA 01/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Failure to execute a final judicial decision concerning a plot of land undermining the right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33209
MATHONY v. Luxemburg
MATHONY v. Luxemburg LUX 15/05/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of objective impartiality of a criminal court due to the fact that the judges who dismissed the applicant s appeal had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-127
MATTHIES-LENZEN v. Luxemburg
MATTHIES LENZEN v. Luxemburg LUX 05/02/2002 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages and lack of an effective remedy. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-107