Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5861 - 5880 of 6576
POTIER v. France
POTIER v. France FRA 25/02/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court and excessive length of two sets of criminal proceedings combined with civil action for damages. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32987
PREBIL v. Slovenia
PREBIL v. Slovenia SVN 19/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the applicant s inability to participate in proceedings concerning a motion to deprive him of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52523
PROJECT-TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia
PROJECT TRADE D.O.O. v. Croatia HRV 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: This case concerns the unlawful interference with the applicant company s right to peaceful enjoyment of its possessions due to the cancellation and revocation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57449
PUIG PANELLA v. Spain
PUIG PANELLA v. Spain ESP 25/07/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the rejection of the applicant s request for compensation for prison time on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3509
PUTO AND OTHERS v. Albania
PUTO AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 22/11/2010 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice protection of property and lack of an effective remedy: Domestic authorities failure to execute final judicial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-243
Paraga v. Croatia
Paraga v. Croatia CCPR/C/71/D/727/1996 Communication number s : 727/1996 Author: Dobroslav Paraga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Croatia Submission date 16 Apr 1996 Date of decision 04 Apr 2001 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/727/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/913/en-US
Parun and Bulmer v. New Zealand
Parun and Bulmer v. New Zealand CCPR/C/71/D/952/2000 Communication number s : 952/2000 Author: M. J. Parun and K. D. Bulmer Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Oct 1998 Date of decision 22 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/71/D/952/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/918/en-US
Paul Eric Kingue v. Cameroon
Paul Eric Kingue v. Cameroon CCPR/C/118/D/2388/2014 Communication number s : 2388/2014 Author: Paul Eric Kingue Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Cameroon Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2388/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2234/en-US
Perera v. Sri Lanka
Perera v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002 Communication number s : 1091/2002 Author: Wannakuwatte Perera Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 18 Apr 2002 Date of decision 07 Aug 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/965/en-US
Petit v. France
Petit v. France CCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005 Communication number s : 1384/2005 Author: Robert and Marie Fran oise Petit Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country France Submission date 01 Nov 2004 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1401/en-US
Petkov v. Bulgaria
Petkov v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/65/D/844/1998 Communication number s : 844/1998 Author: Ivan Petkov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Bulgaria Submission date 20 Sep 1996 Date of decision 25 Mar 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/844/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/782/en-US
Pham v. Canada
Pham v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006 Communication number s : 1534/2006 Author: The Trinh Pham Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1009/en-US
Pimentel et al. v. Philippines
Pimentel et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/89/D/1320/2004 Communication number s : 1320/2004 Author: Mariano Pimentel et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Philippines Submission date 11 Oct 2004 Date of decision 19 Mar 2007 JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1320/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1347/en-US
Pirogov v. Russian Federation
Pirogov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/133/D/2916/2016 Communication number s : 2916/2016 Author: Evgeny Pirogov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Russian Federation Submission date 31 Oct 2016 Date of decision 20 Oct 2021 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2916/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3159/en-US
Poma Poma v. Peru
Poma Poma v. Peru CCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006 Communication number s : 1457/2006 Author: ngela Poma Poma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Peru Submission date 28 Dec 2004 Date of decision 27 Mar 2009 Comment: In accordance with rule 90 JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1457/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1495/en-US
Prashanta Kumar Pandey v. Nepal
Prashanta Kumar Pandey v. Nepal CCPR/C/124/D/2413/2014 Communication number s : 2413/2014 Author: Prashanta Kumar Pandey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Nepal Submission date 20 Feb 2014 Date of decision 30 Oct 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2413/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2560/en-US
QUFAJ CO. SH.P.K. v. Albania
QUFAJ CO. SH.P.K. v. Albania ALB 30/03/2005 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce a final judicial decision ordering compensation payment on the ground that the State allegedly EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-323
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
R.B. v. Estonia
R.B. v. Estonia EST 22/09/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns procedural deficiencies in the criminal proceedings where the Supreme Court s decision combined with the investigator omission to warn the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58557
R.E. v. Russian Federation
R.E. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2249/2013 Communication number s : 2249/2013 Author: R.E. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Dec 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2249/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2535/en-US