Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 39
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9146/07 32650/07 Aslam Y. Rasool L. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional United States of America No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000914607https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108599
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WOODS B. Chivers Solicitors GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading punishment Inhuman ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108610
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE : MAURITIUS
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE : MAURITIUS CAT/C/MUS/CO/3 NULL 2011 06 15T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/MUS/CO/3 Distr.: General Convention against Torture 15 June 2011 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English or Degrading UHRICAT/C/MUS/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3cbfb3a4-9d04-4469-8989-fc571e322aa4
CRPD/C/MUS/CO/1 Mauritius
CRPD/C/MUS/CO/1 Mauritius CRPD/C/MUS/CO/1 NULL 2015 09 29T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/MUS/CO/1 Distr.: General Convention on the Rightsof Persons with Disabilities 30 September 2015 Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/MUS/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2e822c0c-16ee-46de-bbc8-12a18ba1e7b1
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
G. K. v. Netherlands
G. K. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008 Communication number s : 1801/2008 Author: G. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Jul 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1801/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1660/en-US
Hamida v. Canada
Hamida v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1544/2007 Communication number s : 1544/2007 Author: Mehrez Ben Abde Hamida Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 22 Jan 2007 Date of decision 18 Mar 2010 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1544/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1562/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of Belize, Chad, China and Malta
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Belize Chad China and Malta. Raineldo Urbina First Secretary at the Embassy of Belize in Brussels said Belize had reviewed UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belize-chad-china-and
Human Rights Council holds Annual thematic discussion on sharing best practices and promoting technical cooperation
Human Rights Council MIDDAY 21 March 2012 Discussion Focuses on Paving the Way towards the Second Cycle of the Universal Periodic Review The Human Rights Council during its midday meeting today held its annual thematic discussion on sharing of best UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-holds-annual-thematic-discussion-sharing-best-practices
Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/43/ADD.3 from 28 April 2015 to 8 May 2015 12 August 2015 Independent Expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons Mauritius United Nations A/HRC/30/43/Add.3 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 August 2015 Original: UNSPA/HRC/30/43/ADD.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A/HRC/30/43/ADD.3&Lang=en
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011 Communication number s : 2124/2011 Author: Mohamed Rabbae Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Nov 2011 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2153/en-US