Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 646
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark CAT/C/60/D/653/2015 Communication number s : 653/2015 Author: A.M.D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Dec 2014 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/653/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3429/en-US
A.M.M. v. Denmark
A.M.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2415/2014 Communication number s : 2415/2014 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jun 2014 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2415/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2231/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
A.T. v. Estonia
A.T. v. Estonia EST 13/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Interference due to dismissal without examination of the detained applicant s complaints concerning the circumstances of his visit to his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51535
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark
A and B v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013 Communication number s : 2291/2013 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 01 Oct 2013 Date of decision 13 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2291/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2128/en-US
Adamovich v. Belarus
Adamovich v. Belarus CCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015 Communication number s : 2619/2015 Author: Marina Adamovich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 26 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2619/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3156/en-US
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/450/2011 Communication number s : 450/2011 Author: Ali Fadel represented by counsel Tarig Hassan of Advokatur Kanonengasse Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 03 Feb JUTBCAT/C/53/D/450/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2035/en-US
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007 Communication number s : 1633/2007 Author: Khilal Avadanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 31 Jul 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1591/en-US
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden,Türkiye
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden T rkiye CAT/C/45/D/373/2009 Communication number s : 373/2009 Author: Munir Aytulun and Lilav Guclu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Sweden T rkiye Submission date 27 Jan 2009 Date of decision 19 Nov JUTBCAT/C/45/D/373/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/61/en-US
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom
B. AND L. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to marry: Prohibition of marriage between a father in law and daughter in law by legislation unless both their former spouses had die. Article 12 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2850
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
BAJRAMI v. Albania
BAJRAMI v. Albania ALB 12/03/2007 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take necessary measures to reunite a divorced father with his child abducted abroad and lack of an effective remedy for preventing or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-237
BEELER v. Switzerland
BEELER v. Switzerland CHE 11/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: This case concerns discrimination based on sex on account of the termination of the applicant s widower s pension when his younger daughter had reached the age of majority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61449
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2019 00:00:00 08/03/2019 16:14:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to ensure the applicant s access to this daughter in the light of the child s mother s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51675
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144