Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1841 - 1860 of 1931
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC A/HRC/7/6/Add.4 from 16 July 2007 to 28 July 2007 28 February 2008 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Democratic Republic of the Congo UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/7/6/Add.4 28 UNSPA/HRC/7/6/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f7%2f6%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/68/Add.2 from 31 May 1998 to 18 June 1998 4 January 1999 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences United States of America UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council UNSPE/CN.4/1999/68/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f68%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/68/Add.3 from 20 November 1998 to 4 December 1998 21 January 1999 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Indonesia UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/68/Add.3 UNSPE/CN.4/1999/68/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f68%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC A/HRC/11/6/Add.3 from 4 February 2008 to 13 February 2008 14 April 2009 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Saudi Arabia UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/11/6/Add.3 14 April 2009 UNSPA/HRC/11/6/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f11%2f6%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights defenders
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 from 10 October 2004 to 21 October 2004 16 March 2005 Special Representative of the Secretary General on human rights defenders T rkiye UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL E/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1 UNSPE/CN.4/2005/101/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f101%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia
Stefan Lars Nystrom v. Australia CCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007 Communication number s : 1557/2007 Author: Stefan Lars Nystrom represented by the Human Rights Law Resource Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Australia Submission JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1557/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1211/en-US
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan
Sultanova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/86/D/915/2000 Communication number s : 915/2000 Author: Darmon Sultanova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 07 Feb 2000 Date of decision 30 Mar 2006 Comment: In accordance JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/915/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1250/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.N. v. Denmark
T.N. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012 Communication number s : 037/2012 Author: T.N. represented by counsel Tyge Trier Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Sep 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/37/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1880/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
T. v. the Czech Republic
T. v. the Czech Republic CZE 17/10/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of family life: Authorities failure to ensure the maintenance of family ties between a father and his daughter who was placed in care following the death of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6372
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TUQUABO-TEKLE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands
TUQUABO TEKLE AND OTHERS v. the Netherlands NLD 01/03/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal by authorities to allow the applicant s daughter by a previous marriage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4533
TURNALI v. Turkey
TURNALI v. Turkey TUR 06/11/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: dismissal of a daughter s request for paternity establishment as out of the statutory limitation period without allowing her to plead EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37318
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Armenia on “Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2)” (Theme I)
Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Armenia on Incriminations ETS 173 and 191 GPC 2 Theme I ARM 2010 12 03 2011 04 11 Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs Directorate of Monitoring Strasbourg 3 December 2010 Public Greco Eval III GRECOGreco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-4E-Final-Armenia-173-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-III-Rep-2010-4E-Final-Armenia-173-PUBLIC