Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 81
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005 Communication number s : 1440/2005 Author: Aalbersberg and 2 084 other Dutch citizens Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Aug 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1291/en-US
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows (ETS No. 181)
Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data regarding supervisory authorities and transborder data flows ETS No. 181 181 Strasbourg 2001 11 08T00:00:00 Treaty open for COEETS No. 181https://rm.coe.int/1680080626
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
Amundson v. Czech Republic
Amundson v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006 Communication number s : 1508/2006 Author: Olga Amundson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Czech Republic Submission date 13 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1508/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1497/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
B. K. v. Czech Republic
B. K. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008 Communication number s : 1844/2008 Author: B. K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Apr 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1342/en-US
Brychta v. Czech Republic
Brychta v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007 Communication number s : 1618/2007 Author: Frantisek Brychta Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Czech Republic Submission date 20 Sep 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1618/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1547/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 16737/90 N/A NLD 9/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 270 339 348 399 403 500h 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001673790https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57902
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE
CASE OF SUKHOVETSKYY v. UKRAINE 13716/02 N/A UKR 3/28/2006 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 3 Not necessary to examine under Art. 14 P1 3 Article 43 of the Law on Parliamentary Elections 2001 Article 24 of the Constitution 343 100 353 574 476 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD001371602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-72893
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
Chytil v. Czech Republic
Chytil v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006 Communication number s : 1452/2006 Author: Renatus J. Chytil Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Czech Republic Submission date 16 Jan 2006 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1452/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1001/en-US
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (ETS No. 127)
Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters ETS No. 127 127 Strasbourg 1988 01 25T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the Member countries of OECD and in its version amended by the 2010 COEETS No. 127https://rm.coe.int/16806a42b0
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008 Communication number s : 1848/2008 Author: D.V. and H.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Sep 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1343/en-US
De Clippele v. Belgium
De Clippele v. Belgium CCPR/C/77/D/1082/2002 Communication number s : 1082/2002 Author: Olivier de Clippele Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Belgium Submission date 08 Mar 2002 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1082/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1047/en-US
Dranichnikov v. Australia
Dranichnikov v. Australia CCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004 Communication number s : 1291/2004 Author: Olga Dranichnikov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 20 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1291/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1327/en-US