Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1401 - 1420 of 1420
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
State comment on Report A/HRC/35/29/Add.4 from 17 May 2016 to 27 May 2018 6 June 2017 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Hungary United Nations A/HRC/35/29/Add.4 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 June 2017 English only Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/35/29/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f35%2f29%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
Report to HRC A/HRC/35/29/Add.1 from 17 May 2016 to 27 May 2017 27 April 2017 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Hungary United Nations A/HRC/35/29/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 21 April 2017 Original: English Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/35/29/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f35%2f29%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/38/48/Add.2 from 10 July 2017 to 19 July 2017 8 May 2018 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Peru United Nations A/HRC/38/48/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 UNSPA/HRC/38/48/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f38%2f48%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/45/9/Add.1 from 13 May 2019 to 17 May 2019 7 July 2020 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Switzerland United Nations UNSPA/HRC/45/9/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f45%2f9%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
X. J. v. Netherlands
X. J. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008 Communication number s : 1840/2008 Author: X. J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Netherlands Submission date 08 Sep 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1840/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1249/en-US
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand
X.Q.H. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012 Communication number s : 2197/2012 Author: X.Q.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country New Zealand Submission date 22 Mar 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2197/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1821/en-US
X and Y v. Netherlands
X and Y v. Netherlands CAT/C/15/D/31/1995 Communication number s : 031/1995 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 15 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Sep 1995 Date of decision 20 Nov 1995 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/15/D/31/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/224/en-US
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation
X. and Y. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016 Communication number s : 100/2016 Author: X. and Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Russian Federation Submission date 29 Dec 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/100/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2658/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X v. Netherlands
X v. Netherlands CAT/C/68/D/863/2018 Communication number s : 863/2018 Author: X represented by counsel Igna Oomen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jan 2018 Date of decision 05 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/863/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2700/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia
Y.G.H. et al v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/434/2010 Communication number s : 434/2010 Author: Y.G.H. et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2010 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/51/D/434/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/7/en-US
Y v. Canada
Y v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/512/2012 Communication number s : 512/2012 Author: Y Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 06 Jan 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/55/D/512/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1980/en-US
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland
Z.S. and A.S. v. Switzerland CRC/C/89/D/74/2019 Communication number s : 74/2019 Author: Z.S. and A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Switzerland Submission date 20 Sep 2018 Date of decision 10 Feb 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCRC/C/89/D/74/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3001/en-US
Z v. Australia
Z v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/802/2017 Communication number s : 802/2017 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/71/D/802/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3368/en-US
Zhen Zhen Zheng v. Netherlands
Zhen Zhen Zheng v. Netherlands CEDAW/C/42/D/15/2007 Communication number s : 015/2007 Author: Zhen Zhen Zheng Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 42 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Jan 2007 Date of decision 27 Oct 2008 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/42/D/15/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1708/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
Ángela Sariego Rodríguez and Ionut-Cosmin Dincă v. Spain
ngela Sariego Rodr guez and Ionut Cosmin Dinc v. Spain E/C.12/70/D/92/2019 Communication number s : 092/2019 Author: ngela Sariego Rodr guez and Ionut Cosmin Dinc Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 To be confirmed Country Spain JUTBE/C.12/70/D/92/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2986/en-US
v. Denmark,France,Paraguay,Switzerland
v. Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland CRC/C/92/2 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 83/2019 31/201774/2019 .30/2017 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 92 Country Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland Submission date Date JUTBCRC/C/92/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3755/en-US