Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4701 - 4720 of 5518
Pereira Montero v. Uruguay
Pereira Montero v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/106/1981 Communication number s : 106/1981 Author: Mabel Pereira Montero Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 29 Aug 1981 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/106/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/396/en-US
Perera v. Sri Lanka
Perera v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002 Communication number s : 1091/2002 Author: Wannakuwatte Perera Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 18 Apr 2002 Date of decision 07 Aug 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1091/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/965/en-US
Perez de Gomez v. Uruguay
Perez de Gomez v. Uruguay CCPR/C/21/D/109/1981 Communication number s : 109/1981 Author: Maria Dolores Perez de Gomez alleged victim s mother Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Uruguay Submission date 17 Aug 1981 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/21/D/109/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/662/en-US
Perterer v. Austria
Perterer v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001 Communication number s : 1015/2001 Author: Paul Perterer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 20 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1124/en-US
Petersen v. Germany
Petersen v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002 Communication number s : 1115/2002 Author: Werner Petersen Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 31 Jan 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/854/en-US
Petit v. France
Petit v. France CCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005 Communication number s : 1384/2005 Author: Robert and Marie Fran oise Petit Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country France Submission date 01 Nov 2004 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1384/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1401/en-US
Petkov v. Bulgaria
Petkov v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/65/D/844/1998 Communication number s : 844/1998 Author: Ivan Petkov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Bulgaria Submission date 20 Sep 1996 Date of decision 25 Mar 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/844/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/782/en-US
Pham v. Canada
Pham v. Canada CCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006 Communication number s : 1534/2006 Author: The Trinh Pham Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 Country Canada Submission date 18 Jul 2006 Date of decision 22 Jul 2008 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1534/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1009/en-US
Pichardo Salazar v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Pichardo Salazar v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/132/D/2833/2016 Communication number s : 2833/2016 Author: Jos Luis Pichardo Salazar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2833/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3189/en-US
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pietraroia v. Uruguay
Pietraroia v. Uruguay CCPR/C/12/D/44/1979 Communication number s : 044/1979 Author: Alba Pietraroia alleged victim s daughter Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Uruguay Submission date 01 Jan 1979 Date of decision 27 Mar 1981 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/44/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/622/en-US
Pindado Martínez v. Spain
Pindado Mart nez v. Spain CCPR/C/94/D/1490/2006 Communication number s : 1490/2006 Author: Jos Ram n Pindado Mart nez Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country Spain Submission date 06 Apr 2006 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1490/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1467/en-US
Piscioneri v. Spain
Piscioneri v. Spain CCPR/C/78/D/956/2000 Communication number s : 956/2000 Author: Rocco Piscioneri Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Spain Submission date 11 May 2000 Date of decision 07 Aug 2003 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/956/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/360/en-US
Platonov v. Russian Federation
Platonov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/85/D/1218/2003 Communication number s : 1218/2003 Author: Andrei Platonov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Russian Federation Submission date 27 May 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2005 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1218/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1203/en-US
Plotnikov v. Russian Federation
Plotnikov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/65/D/784/1997 Communication number s : 784/1997 Author: Nicolai S. Plotnikov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Russian Federation Submission date 13 May 1997 Date of decision 25 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/784/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/777/en-US
Podolnova v. Russian Federation
Podolnova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/96/D/1309/2004 Communication number s : 1309/2004 Author: Yevgeniya Podolnova Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Russian Federation Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 28 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1309/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1518/en-US
Polish Society of Anti-Discrimination Law v. Poland
Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law v. Poland CEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018 Communication number s : 136/2018 Author: Polish Society of Anti Discrimination Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Poland Submission date 13 Sep JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/136/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2660/en-US
Poplavny, Sudalenko v. Belarus
Poplavny Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012 Communication number s : 2139/2012 Author: Poplavny Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Feb 2012 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2129/en-US
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (ETS No. 155) (*)
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms restructuring the control machinery established thereby ETS No. 155 155 Strasbourg 1994 05 11T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an COEETS No. 155https://rm.coe.int/168007cda9
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention (CETS No. 194) (*)
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending the control system of the Convention CETS No. 194 194 Strasbourg 2004 05 13T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of COECETS No. 194https://rm.coe.int/1680083711