Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 881 - 900 of 1033
J.S. v. Australia
J.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2804/2016 Communication number s : 2804/2016 Author: J.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 24 Aug 2016 Date of decision 01 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2804/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3682/en-US
J.S. v. Canada
J.S. v. Canada CAT/C/62/D/695/2015 Communication number s : 695/2015 Author: J.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder S. Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Canada Submission date 10 Aug 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/695/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2412/en-US
J.X.F.P. v. Australia
J.X.F.P. v. Australia CAT/C/75/D/770/2016 Communication number s : 770/2016 Author: J.X.F.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/770/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3739/en-US
K.E.R. v. Canada
K.E.R. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012 Communication number s : 2196/2012 Author: K.E.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2312/en-US
K.S. and N.K. v. New Zealand
K.S. and N.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/129/D/2769/2016 Communication number s : 2769/2016 Author: K.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country New Zealand Submission date 20 May 2016 Date of decision 24 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2769/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2848/en-US
L.M. v. Canada
L.M. v. Canada CAT/C/63/D/488/2012 Communication number s : 488/2012 Author: L.M. represented by counsel Johanne Doyon and Philippe Larochelle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Canada Submission date 10 Jan 2012 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/488/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2735/en-US
L.P. v. Australia
L.P. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/666/2015 Communication number s : 666/2015 Author: L.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 19 Mar 2015 Date of decision 01 Dec 2016 Comment: Views non violation Substantive JUTBCAT/C/59/D/666/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2168/en-US
Londoño Soto et al. v. Australia,Colombia
Londo o Soto et al. v. Australia Colombia CCPR/C/92/D/1429/2005 Communication number s : 1429/2005 Author: Blanca Lilia Londo o Soto Oscar Alberto Teran Cano Maria Hercilia Cano Bedoya Lina Marcela Teran Londo o and Lilia Andrea Teran Londo o Type of JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1429/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1413/en-US
M.G.C v. Australia
M.G.C v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/1875/2009 Communication number s : 1875/2009 Author: M.G.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 07 Apr 2009 Date of decision 26 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1875/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1950/en-US
M. L. B. v. Luxembourg
M. L. B. v. Luxembourg E/C.12/66/D/20/2017 Communication number s : 020/2017 Author: M. L. B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Luxembourg Submission date Date of decision 11 Oct 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBE/C.12/66/D/20/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2608/en-US
M.R.M.A. v. Australia
M.R.M.A. v. Australia CAT/C/66/D/749/2016 Communication number s : 749/2016 Author: M.R.M.A. represented by counsel John Phillip Sweeney Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 66 Country Australia Submission date 22 Apr 2016 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/66/D/749/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2574/en-US
MONACO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MONACO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/MCO/CO/2 3 NULL 2013 10 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/MCO/CO/2 3 Convention on the Distr.: General 29 October 2013 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/MCO/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d4db696b-21ee-4fec-ba00-e0fc35aa09f1
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Mansour Leghaei et al v. Australia
Mansour Leghaei et al v. Australia CCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010 Communication number s : 1937/2010 Author: Mansour Leghaei et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Australia Submission date 16 Apr 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1937/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1951/en-US
N.S. v. Australia
N.S. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/884/2018 Communication number s : 884/2018 Author: N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 10 Sep 2018 Date of decision 21 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/884/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3367/en-US
O.H.D., O.A.D. and B.O.M. v. Australia
O.H.D. O.A.D. and B.O.M. v. Australia CCPR/C/134/D/3023/2017 Communication number s : 3023/2017 Author: O.H.D. O.A.D. and B.O.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Australia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3023/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3140/en-US
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
Olga Kozulina v. Belarus
Olga Kozulina v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1773/2008 Communication number s : 1773/2008 Author: Olga Kozulina Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 11 Oct 2007 Date of decision 21 Oct 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1773/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1883/en-US
Perterer v. Austria
Perterer v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001 Communication number s : 1015/2001 Author: Paul Perterer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 20 Jul 2004 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1015/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1124/en-US
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c