Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 60
CASE OF BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN
CASE OF BARBER MESSEGU AND JABARDO v. SPAIN 10590/83 N/A ESP 12/6/1988 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies estoppel Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objections ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1206JUD001059083https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57429
CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BEUZE v. BELGIUM 71409/10 PACI D. BEL 11/9/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 Rights of defence Article 6 3 c Defence through legal assistance Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1109JUD007140910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187802
CASE OF BOBEK v. POLAND
CASE OF BOBEK v. POLAND 68761/01 N/A POL 7/17/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 6 3 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD006876101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81677
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA
CASE OF BOKHONKO v. GEORGIA 6739/11 LONDARIDZE N. GEO 10/22/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1022JUD000673911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205226
CASE OF BULIGA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF BULIGA v. ROMANIA 22003/12 ROU 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 6 6 3 d Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD002200312https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207925
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CAMPBELL AND FELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7819/77 7878/77 N/A GBR 6/28/1984 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 b Violation of Art. 6 3 c Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0628JUD000781977https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57456
CASE OF D. v. FINLAND
CASE OF D. v. FINLAND 30542/04 ARTIMO T. FIN 7/7/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 445 76 136 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD003054204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93456
CASE OF DOLENEC v. CROATIA
CASE OF DOLENEC v. CROATIA 25282/06 RAMUSCAK M. HRV 11/26/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD002528206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-95896
CASE OF DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN
CASE OF DROZD AND JANOUSEK v. FRANCE AND SPAIN 12747/87 N/A ESP FRA 6/26/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed incompetence Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 1 Franco andorran custom on the transfer to French ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0626JUD001274787https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57774
CASE OF EBANKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EBANKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 36822/06 McMILLAN R. GBR 1/26/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c 445 76 86 136 440 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126JUD003682206 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF EBANKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. 36822/06 JUDGMENT ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126JUD003682206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96925
CASE OF EZEH AND CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EZEH AND CONNORS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 39665/98 40086/98 N/A GBR 10/9/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 3 c Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Justice Act 1991 section ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009JUD003966598https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61333
CASE OF GÄFGEN v. GERMANY
CASE OF G FGEN v. GERMANY 22978/05 HEUCHEMER M. DEU 6/30/2008 12:00:00 AM No longer a victim of a violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 Articles 1 and 104 of the Basic Law Article 136a of the Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 57a and 211 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0630JUD002297805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87305
CASE OF GÄFGEN v. GERMANY
CASE OF G FGEN v. GERMANY 22978/05 HEUCHEMER M. DEU 6/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 1 and 6 3 Articles 1 1 and 104 1 of the Basic Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0601JUD002297805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99015
CASE OF G. v. FRANCE
CASE OF G. v. FRANCE 27244/09 FEBBRARO L. FRA 2/23/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 3 Rights of defence Article 6 3 c Defence in person Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD002724409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109219
CASE OF GORNY v. POLAND
CASE OF GORNY v. POLAND 50399/07 N/A POL 6/8/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 445 440 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608JUD005039907 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF G RNY v. POLAND Application no. 50399/07 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 8 June 2010 FINAL 08/09/2010 This ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0608JUD005039907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99180
CASE OF JAŁOWIECKI v. POLAND
CASE OF JA OWIECKI v. POLAND 34030/07 KORNAS PIERZAK I. POL 2/17/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217JUD003403007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91290
CASE OF JELCOVAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF JELCOVAS v. LITHUANIA 16913/04 N/A LTU 7/19/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 3 445 440 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD001691304 SECOND SECTION CASE OF JELCOVAS v. LITHUANIA Application no. 16913/04 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 July ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0719JUD001691304https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105685
CASE OF KADAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF KADAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA 12391/06 MUKHASHAVRIA L. VAKHTANGIDZE V. IMNAISHVILI V. GEO 5/14/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514JUD001239106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202435