Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2204
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A/HRC/47/15: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Georgia
United Nations A/HRC/47/15 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/15https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4715-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-georgia
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABENAVOLI v. Italy
ABENAVOLI v. Italy ITA 02/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The Abenavoli group of cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts since the 1990s violations of Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28186
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine UKR 10/10/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or controlled by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25317
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGACHE v. Romania
AGACHE v. Romania ROU 04/01/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: failure of authorities to secure the prompt recovery of the damages awarded to the applicant by a criminal ruling of domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13399
AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. Switzerland
AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. Switzerland CHE 21/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:09:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the lack of adequate judicial scrutiny of freezing and confiscation procedures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5846
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
ALBUL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/06/2020 00:00:00 19/06/2020 16:03:34 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect. Article 6 1 and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55423
ALLIANCE CAPITAL (LUXEMBOURG) SA v. Luxemburg
ALLIANCE CAPITAL LUXEMBOURG SA v. Luxemburg LUX 18/04/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court on account of a material error made by the Court of Cassation subsequently EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-129
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
AMURARITEI v. Romania
AMURARITEI v. Romania ROU 23/12/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the res judicata principle due to the fact that the domestic courts disregarded the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16195
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 25/12/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to obtain a full judicial review of the authorities decisions permitting the construction of a railway EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2190