Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3801 - 3820 of 3829
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/30/34/Add.1 from 7 October 2014 to 10 October 2014 17 August 2015 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination C te d Ivoire United UNSPA/HRC/30/34/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f30%2f34%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination (Visit to EU institutions)
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.4 from 25 April 2016 to 28 April 2016 11 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Visit to EU institutions UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Croatia
X AND Y v. Croatia HRV 03/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Denial of a fair hearing due to lack of procedural safeguards in proceedings divesting the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10109
X, Y, A, B, C and D v. Greece
X Y A B C and D v. Greece CCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015 Communication number s : 2701/2015 Author: X Y A B C and D Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Greece Submission date 25 Sep 2015 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2899/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/75/D/1081/2021 Communication number s : 1081/2021 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jun 2021 Date of decision 11 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1081/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3613/en-US
X. v. Argentina
X. v. Argentina CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012 Communication number s : 008/2012 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Argentina Submission date 22 Jun 2012 Date of decision 11 Apr 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/11/D/8/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1989/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015 Communication number s : 2681/2015 Author: Y.A.A. and F.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Nov 2015 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2293/en-US
Y.L. v. Canada
Y.L. v. Canada CCPR/C/27/D/112/1981 Communication number s : 112/1981 Author: Y.L. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 07 Dec 1981 Date of decision 08 Apr 1986 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/27/D/112/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/745/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YURTAYEV v. Ukraine
YURTAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 01/05/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 11:15:48 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-23665
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/107/D/1835 1837/2008 Communication number s : 1837/2008 1835/2018 Author: Anton Yasinovich and Valery Shevchenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Belarus Submission date 07 May 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1835,1837/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3212/en-US
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus
Yasinovich and Shevchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/107/D/1835 1837/2008 Communication number s : 1837/2008 1835/2008 Author: Anton Yasinovich and Valery Shevchenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Belarus Submission date 07 May 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1835&1837/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1273/en-US
Zündel v. Canada
Z ndel v. Canada CCPR/C/78/D/953/2000 Communication number s : 953/2000 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Canada Submission date 21 Aug 2000 Date of decision 27 Jul 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/953/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/955/en-US
ZAGREBACKA BANKA D.D. v. Croatia
ZAGREBACKA BANKA D.D. v. Croatia HRV 12/03/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of enforcement proceedings leading to the seizure of a substantial amount of money due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10345
ZAHIROVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
ZAHIROVIC v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 16/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Delayed enforcement of a final domestic judgment ordering the applicants employers EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50565
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia
ZARA ISAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14078
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The cases 1 of this group concern the long lasting moratorium on the alienation of agricultural land found by the Court to be in violation of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50173
ZIELINSKI AND PRADAL v. France
ZIELINSKI AND PRADAL v. France FRA 28/10/1999 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice or protection of property: Denial of a fair trial as well as disproportionate interference with property due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32975