Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 4146
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ALIMUCAJ v. Albania
ALIMUCAJ v. Albania ALB 09/07/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: No punishment without law: Infringement of the principle of legality of criminal offences and punishments due to imposition of a heavier penalty than the one liable for at EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-337
AMURARITEI v. Romania
AMURARITEI v. Romania ROU 23/12/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the res judicata principle due to the fact that the domestic courts disregarded the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16195
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANDRIY RUDENKO v. Ukraine
ANDRIY RUDENKO v. Ukraine UKR 21/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to a domestic court s decisions to terminate a title to a part of a flat a husband had jointly owned with his former EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31618
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France
ANNONI DI GUSSOLA AND OTHERS v. France FRA 14/02/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to the Court of Cassation President s decision under a specific provision of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33009
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine UKR 15/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings on account of the domestic courts failure to address the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58183
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 23/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Supreme Court s dismissal of the applicants amparo appeals concerning the calculation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51361
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
ATES MIMARLIK MUHENDISLIK A.S v. Turkey
ATES MIMARLIK MUHENDISLIK A.S v. Turkey TUR 11/02/2013 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right of access to court on account of the refusal of domestic courts to take into consideration the judgment of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35422
AYDOGAN AND DARA RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI v. Turkey
AYDOGAN AND DARA RADYO TELEVIZYON YAYINCILIK ANONIM SIRKETI v. Turkey TUR 02/07/2018 00:00:00 02/08/2018 10:38:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the judicial authorities refusal to issue EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49963
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania
BALTIC MASTER LTD. v. Lithuania LTU 16/04/2019 00:00:00 25/04/2019 11:23:50 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the lack of adequate reasoning for a refusal of the domestic courts in 2016 to refer a question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51955