Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 501 - 520 of 757
K.E.R. v. Canada
K.E.R. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012 Communication number s : 2196/2012 Author: K.E.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 28 Jul 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2196/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2312/en-US
Kristjánsson v. Iceland
Kristj nsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/78/D/951/2000 Communication number s : 951/2000 Author: Bjorn Kristj nsson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Iceland Submission date 06 Jul 2000 Date of decision 16 Jul 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/951/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/359/en-US
Kulumbetov v. Kazakhstan
Kulumbetov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2547/2015 Communication number s : 2547/2015 Author: Arman Kulumbetov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2547/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3260/en-US
Kurtinbaeva v. Kazakhstan
Kurtinbaeva v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2540/2015 Communication number s : 2540/2015 Author: Ayauzhan Kurtinbaeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2540/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3490/en-US
L.P. v. Australia
L.P. v. Australia CAT/C/59/D/666/2015 Communication number s : 666/2015 Author: L.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 59 Country Australia Submission date 19 Mar 2015 Date of decision 01 Dec 2016 Comment: Views non violation Substantive JUTBCAT/C/59/D/666/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2168/en-US
M.K.M. v. Australia
M.K.M. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/681/2015 Communication number s : 681/2015 Author: M.K.M. represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 18 May 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 JUTBCAT/C/60/D/681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2253/en-US
Marlon James Noble v. Australia
Marlon James Noble v. Australia CRPD/C/16/D/7/2012 Communication number s : 007/2012 Author: Marlon James Noble Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 Country Australia Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of decision 02 Sep 2016 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/16/D/7/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2144/en-US
Midiam Iricelda Valdez Cantú et al. v. Mexico
Midiam Iricelda Valdez Cant et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/127/D/2766/2016 Communication number s : 2766/2016 Author: Midiam Iricelda Valdez Cant and Mar a Hortencia Rivas Rodr guez on their own behalf and on behalf of V ctor Manuel Guajardo Rivas their missing JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2766/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2803/en-US
Mikmaq tribal society v. Canada
Mikmaq tribal society v. Canada CCPR/C/22/D/78/1980 Communication number s : 078/1980 Author: A.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 22 Country Canada Submission date 30 Sep 1980 Date of decision 29 Jul 1984 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/22/D/78/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/530/en-US
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018 Communication number s : 3153/2018 Author: Rovshan Mursalov Fatima Balova Milena Makarenko Basti Rasulova Galina Fazliahmadova and Goderdzi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3681/en-US
N.M. v.
N.M. v. CEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015 Communication number s : 092/2015 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Submission date 04 Jun 2015 Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2642/en-US
N.M. v. Türkiye
N.M. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015 Communication number s : 092/2015 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country T rkiye Submission date Date of decision 09 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/70/D/92/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2430/en-US
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006 Communication number s : 1535/2006 Author: Nataliya Litvin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 15 Jun 2006 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1593/en-US
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015 Communication number s : 2546/2015 Author: Damir Nurlanuly Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3255/en-US
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US
Phillip v. Trinidad and Tobago
Phillip v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/64/D/594/1992 Communication number s : 594/1992 Author: Irving Phillip Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Feb 1994 Date of decision 20 Oct 1998 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/594/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/806/en-US
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, restructuring the control machinery established thereby (ETS No. 155) (*)
Protocol No. 11 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms restructuring the control machinery established thereby ETS No. 155 155 Strasbourg 1994 05 11T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an COEETS No. 155https://rm.coe.int/168007cda9
Protocol No. 15 amending the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (CETS No. 213) (*)
Protocol No. 15 amending the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms CETS No. 213 213 Strasbourg 2013 06 24T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of ETS 5 and is closed to legal acts. COECETS No. 213https://rm.coe.int/1680084831
Protocol No. 2 to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities concerning interterritorial co-operation (ETS No. 169)
Protocol No. 2 to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities concerning interterritorial co operation ETS No. 169 169 Strasbourg 1998 05 05T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the States COEETS No. 169https://rm.coe.int/168007f2cb
Protocol No. 3 to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities concerning Euroregional Co-operation Groupings (ECGs) (CETS No. 206)
Protocol No. 3 to the European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities concerning Euroregional Co operation Groupings ECGs CETS No. 206 206 Utrecht 2009 11 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by COECETS No. 206https://rm.coe.int/1680084827