Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1121 - 1140 of 1249
K.I.A. v. Denmark
K.I.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/74/D/82/2015 Communication number s : 82/2015 Author: K.I.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Denmark Submission date 08 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Nov 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/82/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3128/en-US
KENYA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
KENYA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/KEN/CO/3 NULL 2022 05 30T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/KEN/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 30 May 2022 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/KEN/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6c8b0124-de61-4b5c-9c60-df9761f39d70
L.D. AND P.K. v. Bulgaria
L.D. AND P.K. v. Bulgaria BGR 08/03/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Breach on account of the statutory inability for putative biological fathers of children born outside of marriage to challenge EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46329
LEBOIS v. Bulgaria
LEBOIS v. Bulgaria BGR 19/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: This case concerns the infringement of the applicant s right to private life and correspondence during the first half of 2014 due to the fact that the restrictions on visits EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48899
LITHANIA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LITHANIA : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/LTU/CO/4 NULL 2021 12 21T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/LTU/CO/4 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 21 December 2021 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/LTU/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5e2a30b4-c907-49e0-b233-1e1145500877
Laaroussi v. Morocco
Laaroussi v. Morocco CAT/C/74/D/891/2018 Communication number s : 891/2018 Author: Abdel Jalil Laaroussi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Morocco Submission date 19 Oct 2018 Date of decision 15 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/74/D/891/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3615/en-US
Leirvåg et al. v. Norway
Leirv g et al. v. Norway CCPR/C/82/D/1155/2003 Communication number s : 1155/2003 Author: Unn and Ben Leirv g and their daughter Guro Richard Jansen and his daughter Maria Birgit and Jens Orning and their daughter Pia Suzanne and Irene Gal en and Edvin JUTBCCPR/C/82/D/1155/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1298/en-US
Loth v. Germany
Loth v. Germany CCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008 Communication number s : 1754/2008 Author: Edith Loth and her heirs Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Germany Submission date 29 May 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1578/en-US
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015 Communication number s : 2535/2015 Author: Lukpan Akhmedyarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2860/en-US
M.B.S. v. Denmark
M.B.S. v. Denmark CCPR/C/125/D/2439/2014 Communication number s : 2439/2014 Author: M.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Denmark Submission date 04 Jul 2014 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2439/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3306/en-US
M.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia
M.H. AND OTHERS v. Slovakia SVK 03/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: The friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties included the following text: The parties note that at its meeting of 23 June 2021 the Government of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60407
M.Z. v. Belgium
M.Z. v. Belgium CAT/C/67/D/813/2017 Communication number s : 813/2017 Author: M.Z. represented by counsel Wolfgang Kaleck European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Belgium JUTBCAT/C/67/D/813/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2627/en-US
MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan
MAHMUDOV AND AGAZADE v. Azerbaijan AZE 18/03/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression of the applicant journalists in all cases due to in particular to the unjustified use of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1709
MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. Georgia
MAKHARADZE AND SIKHARULIDZE v. Georgia GEO 22/02/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: Makharadze and Sikharulidze 35254/07 judgment of 22/11/2011 final on 22/02/2012 Chkotua and Arkania 60909/08 decision final on 20/05/2014 Dzebniauri EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5840
MEXICO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MEXICO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/MEX/CO/2 3 NULL 2022 04 20T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/MEX/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 20 April 2022 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/MEX/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8a7e638f-259f-404b-b1f7-4851be144c86
MILATOVA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
MILATOVA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 21/09/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing and infringement of defence rights in property restitution proceedings and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6126
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
NIGER: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NIGER: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/NER/CO/1 NULL 2016 10 10T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/NER/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 11 October 2016 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: French Members UHRICMW/C/NER/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/bc8de2b7-73ea-4c65-952f-8e4781326f29
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006 Communication number s : 1535/2006 Author: Nataliya Litvin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 15 Jun 2006 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1593/en-US