Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 10379
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
AGOUDIMOS & CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece
AGOUDIMOS CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece GRC 28/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Legislative interference during proceedings before the Court of Cassation which determined EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22178
ARRAS AND OTHERS v. Italy
ARRAS AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 14/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Retroactive legislative interference in litigation between private parties without compelling reason of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28252
Adolf Lange v. Czech Republic
Adolf Lange v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/102/D/1586/2007 Communication number s : 1586/2007 Author: Adolf Lange Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Czech Republic Submission date 29 Jan 2007 Date of decision 13 Jul 2011 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1586/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1618/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Althammer et al. (2) v. Austria
Althammer et al. 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/78/D/998/2001 Communication number s : 998/2001 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Austria Submission date 22 Apr 1998 Date of decision 08 Aug 2003 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/998/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1054/en-US
Amirov v. Russian Federation
Amirov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006 Communication number s : 1447/2006 Author: Abubakar Amirov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2006 Date of decision 02 Apr 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1503/en-US
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan
Avadanov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007 Communication number s : 1633/2007 Author: Khilal Avadanov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 31 Jul 2007 Date of decision 25 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1633/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1591/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
Béatrice Marin v. France
B atrice Marin v. France CCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008 Communication number s : 1793/2008 Author: B atrice Marin Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country France Submission date 05 May 2008 Date of decision 27 Jul 2010 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1793/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1575/en-US
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008 Communication number s : 1748/2008 Author: Josef Bergauer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 100 Country Czech Republic Submission date 05 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1553/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 34098/11 GUZMAN M. SWE 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Somalia 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003409811 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003409811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145789
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 14499/09 RIMSTEN E. SWE 6/28/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Extradition Conditional Yemen No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Yemen 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111553
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA 49097/08 N/A RUS 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD004909708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108605
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282