Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 120
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
CASE OF IBRAGIM IBRAGIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF IBRAGIM IBRAGIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 1413/08 28621/11 SYCHEV S. RUS 8/28/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD000141308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-185293
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA 26261/05 26377/06 HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE MEMORIAL RUS 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nulla poena sine lege ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002626105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117127
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF M.A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 5115/18 SAVOVA I. BGR 2/20/2020 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Violation of Article 2 3 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD000511518https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201351
CASE OF NOVRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF NOVRUK AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 31039/11 48511/11 76810/12 14618/13 13817/14 RUS 3/15/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for private life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0315JUD003103911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161379
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA 56774/18 SIMAITIS R. LTU 6/13/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005677418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225220
CASE OF VILVARAJAH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VILVARAJAH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13163/87 13164/87 13165/87 13447/87 13448/87 N/A GBR 10/30/1991 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 Immigration Act 1971 Sections 4 para. 1 13 16 17 Statement of Changes in ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1030JUD001316387https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57713
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD : AUSTRALIA
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD : AUSTRALIA CRC/C/AUS/CO/4 NULL 2012 08 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/AUS/CO/4 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 August 2012 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on UHRICRC/C/AUS/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/90a97d8b-3f51-4934-96c0-09701bc434a4
Comments of the Government on the Second Opinion on Poland
Comments of the Government on the Second Opinion on Poland POL Strasbourg 7 December 2009 GVT/COM/II 2009 003 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF POLAND ON THE SECOND FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=2nd_Com_Poland_en
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Gnaneswaran v. Australia
Gnaneswaran v. Australia CCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018 Communication number s : 3212/2018 Author: Thileepan Gnaneswaran Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2018 Date of decision 27 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3155/en-US
H.S. et al. v. Canada
H.S. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/2948/2017 Communication number s : 2948/2017 Author: H.S. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jan 2017 Date of decision 14 Mar 2019 Comment: A joint opinion JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2948/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2566/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Qatar, Nicaragua and Italy
The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Qatar Nicaragua and Italy. Ahmad Bin Abdullah Al Mahmoud Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of Qatar said Qatar paid significant attention to the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-qatar
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom, India and Brazil
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom India and Brazil.Karen Pierce Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-kingdom
Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2006/43/Add.1 from 23 October 2005 to 8 November 2005 27 March 2006 Independent Expert on the question of human rights and extreme poverty United States of America UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council UNSPE/CN.4/2006/43/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2006%2f43%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
J.K. et al. v. Republic of Korea
J.K. et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/128/D/2939/2017 Communication number s : 2939/2017 Author: J.K. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Jan 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2939/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2836/en-US
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark
M.Z.B.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015 Communication number s : 2593/2015 Author: M.Z.B.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 31 Mar 2015 Date of decision 20 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2593/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2240/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US