Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1062
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGOUDIMOS & CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece
AGOUDIMOS CEFALLONIAN SKY SHIPPING COMPANY v. Greece GRC 28/09/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Legislative interference during proceedings before the Court of Cassation which determined EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22178
ASSOCIATION BURESTOP 55 v. France
ASSOCIATION BURESTOP 55 v. France FRA 01/10/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Disproportionate restriction of access to a court for an environmental protection association on account of the manifestly unreasonable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58727
Allen v. Jamaica
Allen v. Jamaica CCPR/C/50/D/332/1988 Communication number s : 332/1988 Author: Devon Allen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Jamaica Submission date 20 Oct 1988 Date of decision 31 Mar 1994 Comment: A decision under rule 86 was JUTBCCPR/C/50/D/332/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/535/en-US
Amirov v. Russian Federation
Amirov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006 Communication number s : 1447/2006 Author: Abubakar Amirov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2006 Date of decision 02 Apr 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1503/en-US
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
Blanco Abad v. Spain
Blanco Abad v. Spain CAT/C/20/D/59/1996 Communication number s : 059/1996 Author: Encarnaci n Blanco Abad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Spain Submission date 12 Feb 1996 Date of decision 14 May 1998 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/20/D/59/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/246/en-US
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
C.Y. v. Denmark
C.Y. v. Denmark CAT/C/63/D/647/2014 Communication number s : 647/2014 Author: C.Y. represented by counsel Niels Erik Hansen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Dec 2014 Date of decision 17 May 2018 JUTBCAT/C/63/D/647/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2741/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA 49097/08 N/A RUS 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD004909708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108605
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF A.N. v. LITHUANIA 17280/08 GZIMAILA V. LTU 5/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD001728008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163344
CASE OF ABAKAROVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABAKAROVA v. RUSSIA 16664/07 MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 10/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD001666407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157697