Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 833
A/HRC/38/7/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mali - Addendum - Views on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review
United Nations A/HRC/38/7/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 June 2018 English Original: French Human Rights Council Thirty eighth session 18 June 6 July 2018 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/38/7/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc387add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mali-addendum-views
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A/HRC/47/17: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nauru
United Nations A/HRC/47/17 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/17https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4717-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nauru
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
A. v. Norway
A. v. Norway NOR 09/07/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private life: Domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation due to the unfavourable outcome of a defamation suit that he brought against a newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-205
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AEPI S.A. v. Greece
AEPI S.A. v. Greece GRC 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of excess to a court due to dismissals of appeals on points of law by the Court of Cassation as being out of time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22216
ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. Ukraine
ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 15/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns the condemnation of a journalist in civil defamation proceedings for publishing an allegedly defamatory article published about judges in 2005 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62238
ANTICA AND SC R SA v. Romania
ANTICA AND SC R SA v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Unfair civil proceedings for defamation and disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Lack of reasoning of the court decisions holding both EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16579
AQUILINA AND OTHERS v. Malta
AQUILINA AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 14/09/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:13:19 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to damages granted in the defamation proceedings. Status of Execution: The defamation proceedings were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4103
ARMONIENE v. Lithuania
ARMONIENE v. Lithuania LTU 25/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure to protect private lives due to the award of only a derisory sum in respect of non pecuniary damages in defamation proceedings brought EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4235
AURELIAN OPREA v. Romania
AURELIAN OPREA v. Romania ROU 19/04/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Freedom of expression: disproportionate interference due to the substantial amount of civil damages the applicant was ordered to pay to the plaintiff in defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13401
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Supreme Court s failure to award to the applicants as victims of defamation a proportionate compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6852
Adonis v. Philippines
Adonis v. Philippines CCPR/C/103/D/1815/2008/Rev.1 Communication number s : 1815/2008 Author: Alexander Adonis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Philippines Submission date 03 Jul 2008 Date of decision 26 Oct 2011 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1815/2008/Rev.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1613/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland
BJORK EIDSDOTTIR v. Iceland ISL 10/10/2012 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:27:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to convictions of the applicant journalists in civil defamation proceedings brought against them on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-71
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173