Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 8935
Aouf v. Belgium
Aouf v. Belgium CCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001 Communication number s : 1010/2001 Author: Lass ad Aouf Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Belgium Submission date 22 May 2001 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1010/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1201/en-US
Arredondo v. Peru
Arredondo v. Peru CCPR/C/69/D/688/1996 Communication number s : 688/1996 Author: Ms. Carolina Teillier Arredondo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Peru Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/688/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/882/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: Asmae Taghzouti Ezqouihel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 22 Feb 2021 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/69/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2922/en-US
Aumeeruddy-Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius
Aumeeruddy Cziffra et al. v. Mauritius CCPR/C/12/D/35/1978 Communication number s : 035/1978 Author: Shirin Aumeeruddy Cziffra and 19 other Mauritian women Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 12 Country Mauritius Submission date 02 May 1978 JUTBCCPR/C/12/D/35/1978https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/319/en-US
Ayas v. Sweden
Ayas v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/97/1997 Communication number s : 097/1997 Author: Orhan Ayas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/97/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/255/en-US
B.A.C. v. Greece
B.A.C. v. Greece GRC 13/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 15:59:50 Case Description: The case concerned the failure by the Greek authorities to decide on an asylum application lodged by the applicant for more than twelve years. The Court held that the above EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46537
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B. K. v. Czech Republic
B. K. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008 Communication number s : 1844/2008 Author: B. K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Apr 2008 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1844/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1342/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/49/D/437/2010 Communication number s : 437/2010 Author: B.M.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Sweden Submission date 10 Aug 2010 Date of decision 12 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/437/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/17/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.T. v. Turkey
B.T. v. Turkey TUR 14/11/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities delay in paying the applicants remainders of compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28537
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BHR/CO/4 6 NULL 2019 02 27T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BHR/CO/4 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 27 February 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/BHR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a7e5b6f3-e35e-4031-8994-0fd536724a51
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 05 29T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 29 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BHR/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b4b69f2-8805-4d8f-900f-73aa61bc578e
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 NULL 2022 08 03T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BHR/CO/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 4 August 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BHR/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/18e467c9-deff-4ae2-b9f4-cd401c8e7df1
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2017 05 22T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/BGD/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 22 May 2017 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/20e1933b-fa48-4efc-b2ab-162c6347a54c