Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 950
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
CASE OF A.P., M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.P. M.P. AND T.P. v. SWITZERLAND 19958/92 N/A CHE 8/29/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Ordinance on Direct Federal Tax ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD001995892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58178
CASE OF AÏT-MOUHOUB v. FRANCE
CASE OF A T MOUHOUB v. FRANCE 22924/93 N/A FRA 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards first complaint Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards second complaint Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002292493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58259
CASE OF A. v. FRANCE
CASE OF A. v. FRANCE 14838/89 N/A FRA 11/23/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected out of time Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1123JUD001483889https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57848
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25599/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002559994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58232
CASE OF ABDOELLA v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF ABDOELLA v. THE NETHERLANDS 12728/87 N/A NLD 11/25/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected out of time Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1125JUD001272887https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57765
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF ACADEMY TRADING LTD AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF ACADEMY TRADING LTD AND OTHERS v. GREECE 30342/96 GRC 4/4/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to impartiality Violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to the length of the proceedings Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0404JUD003034296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58536
CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE
CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE 19248/91 N/A FRA 11/21/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 76 41 101 406 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1121JUD001924891 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE Application no. 19248/91 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 November 1995 In ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1121JUD001924891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57950
CASE OF ADILETTA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF ADILETTA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 13978/88 14236/88 14237/88 N/A ITA 2/19/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Reasonable time Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001397888https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57671
CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA 8269/78 N/A AUT 3/26/1982 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 Austrian Penal Code Section 42 445 136 70 325 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA Application no. 8269/78 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57417
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AERTS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF AERTS v. BELGIUM 25357/94 N/A BEL 7/30/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected victims out of time Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 3 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0730JUD002535794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58209
CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9118/80 N/A GBR 10/24/1986 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Customs and Excise Act 1952 Section 288 369 62 321 168 304 509 445 70 448 339 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1024JUD000911880 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF AGOSI v. THE UNITED ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1024JUD000911880https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57418
CASE OF AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE 14807/89 N/A GRC 10/24/1995 12:00:00 AM Not necessary to examine preliminary objection ratione temporis Preliminary objection allowed victim Lack of jurisdiction complaint inadmissible new complaint Civil Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1024JUD001480789https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57951