Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 161 - 180 of 351
CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 23452/94 N/A GBR 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002345294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58257
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF PADOVANI v. ITALY
CASE OF PADOVANI v. ITALY 13396/87 N/A ITA 2/26/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies estoppel No violation of Art. 6 1 Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 31 74 231 505 Constitutional Court Decisions no. 61 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0226JUD001339687https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57812
CASE OF PARASKEVOPOULOS v. GREECE
CASE OF PARASKEVOPOULOS v. GREECE 64184/11 ZACHARIADIS A. GRC 6/28/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression 149 148 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD006418411 FIRST SECTION CASE OF PARASKEVOPOULOS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD006418411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183814
CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO
CASE OF PASQUINI v. SAN MARINO 50956/16 PAGLIANO A. SMR 5/2/2019 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 1 Six month period Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0502JUD005095616https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192787
CASE OF PAUWELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF PAUWELS v. BELGIUM 10208/82 N/A BEL 5/26/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0526JUD001020882https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57555
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 10/15/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Article 41 Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158235
CASE OF PERİNÇEK v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF PER N EK v. SWITZERLAND 27510/08 CENGIZ M. CHE 12/17/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD002751008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139724
CASE OF PHOCAS v. FRANCE
CASE OF PHOCAS v. FRANCE 17869/91 CALAFFEL P. FRA 4/23/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Preliminary objection rejected out of time No violation of Art. 6 1 Decree no. 58 146 of 31 December 1958 Articles 1 2 8 10 12 13 17 18 23 24 26 27 28 Town ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0423JUD001786991https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57981
CASE OF PIERSACK v. BELGIUM
CASE OF PIERSACK v. BELGIUM 8692/79 N/A BEL 10/1/1982 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved 445 136 180 181 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:1001JUD000869279 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF PIERSACK v. BELGIUM Application no. 8692/79 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:1001JUD000869279https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57557
CASE OF POISS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF POISS v. AUSTRIA 9816/82 N/A AUT 4/23/1987 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Reasonable time Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0423JUD000981682https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57560
CASE OF POITRIMOL v. FRANCE
CASE OF POITRIMOL v. FRANCE 14032/88 N/A FRA 11/23/1993 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1123JUD001403288https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57858
CASE OF POWELL AND RAYNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF POWELL AND RAYNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9310/81 N/A GBR 2/21/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 13 1982 Civil Aviation Act Section 76 1 Air Navigation Noise Certification Order 1987 444 110 451 429 426 445 14 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0221JUD000931081 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0221JUD000931081https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57622
CASE OF PRÖTSCH v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF PR TSCH v. AUSTRIA 15508/89 N/A AUT 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Federal Agricultural Land Planning General Principles Act 1951 as amended in 1977 section 10 5 6 and 7 Federal Constitution Articles 12 para. 2 130 132 133 para. 4 and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD001550889https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58078
CASE OF PRAGER AND OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF PRAGER AND OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA 15974/90 N/A AUT 4/26/1995 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim No violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 10 Criminal Code Article 111 Media Act section 29 183 498 149 148 158 157 201 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0426JUD001597490https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57926
CASE OF PROCOLA v. LUXEMBOURG
CASE OF PROCOLA v. LUXEMBOURG 14570/89 N/A LUX 9/28/1995 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses award Act of 8 February 1961 on the Conseil d Etat section 22 Constitution Articles 76 paras. 2 and 3 84 Act of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0928JUD001457089https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57944
CASE OF PUGLIESE v. ITALY (No. 1)
CASE OF PUGLIESE v. ITALY No. 1 11840/85 N/A ITA 2/19/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 406 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001184085 In the Pugliese I case The European Court of Human Rights ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001184085https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57659
CASE OF R.E. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF R.E. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 62498/11 HARTE N. GBR 10/27/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1027JUD006249811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158159
CASE OF R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10496/83 N/A GBR 7/8/1987 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved Children Acts 1948 and 1975 Child Care Act 1980 451 425 268 203 445 41 7 444 110 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD001049683 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD001049683https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57610
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E SÁ v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF RAMOS NUNES DE CARVALHO E S v. PORTUGAL 55391/13 57728/13 74041/13 RIBEIRO J. PRT 11/6/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106JUD005539113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187507