Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 390
14. Agreement establishing the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 14. Agreement establishing the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean Madrid 24 July 1992 Entry into force : 4 August 1993 in accordance with UNIV-14https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-14&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222
CASE OF ÇAKICI v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKICI v. TURKEY 23657/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 applicant s brother No violation of Art. 3 applicant Violation of Art. 5 Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002365794https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58282
CASE OF AKSOY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKSOY v. TURKEY 21987/93 N/A TUR 12/18/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 25 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1218JUD002198793https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58003
CASE OF AL-JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 27021/08 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Regulation No. 1 of the Coalition Provisional Authority 293 210 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002702108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105612
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF ALİ RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AL RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 30226/10 5506/16 BEZEN S. VALLONI L. SOYDAN A. EDEBALI Z. TUR 1/28/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6 1 Civil rights and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD003022610https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200548
CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE (INTERPRETATION)
CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE INTERPRETATION 15175/89 N/A FRA 8/7/1996 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction interpretation in abstract Interpretation 26 126 214 143 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001517589 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD001517589https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57987
CASE OF AQUILINA v. MALTA
CASE OF AQUILINA v. MALTA 25642/94 N/A MLT 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits Preliminary objection rejected Violation of Art. 5 3 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002564294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58239
CASE OF ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8225/78 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 6 1 Mental Health Act 1959 Section 141 448 228 307 566 150 340 97 232 431 445 136 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000822578https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57425
CASE OF ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
CASE OF ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 24760/94 KALAYDJIEVA Z. BGR 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed abuse of process Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 3 ill treatment Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002476094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58261
CASE OF AYTEKİN v. TURKEY
CASE OF AYTEK N v. TURKEY 22880/93 N/A TUR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies 14 128 449 444 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002288093 AFFAIRE AYTEKIN c. TURQUIE CASE OF AYTEKIN v. TURKEY 102/1997/886/1098 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002288093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58243
CASE OF B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9840/82 N/A GBR 7/8/1987 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved Children and Young Persons Act 1969 Children Act 1975 Child Care Act 1980 451 425 268 203 445 41 7 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000984082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57453
CASE OF BAŞKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF BA KAYA AND OK UOGLU v. TURKEY 23536/94 24408/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 3 Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 7 first applicant Violation of Art. 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002353694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58276
CASE OF BALASKAS v. GREECE
CASE OF BALASKAS v. GREECE 73087/17 THEODOROPOULOS T. GRC 11/5/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Articles 361 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD007308717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-205545
CASE OF BARFOD v. DENMARK
CASE OF BARFOD v. DENMARK 11508/85 N/A DNK 2/22/1989 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 149 148 265 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0222JUD001150885 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF BARFOD v. DENMARK Application no. 11508/85 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 22 February 1989 In the Barfod ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0222JUD001150885https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57430