Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 409
14. Agreement establishing the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 14. Agreement establishing the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean Madrid 24 July 1992 Entry into force : 4 August 1993 in accordance with UNIV-14https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-14&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25599/94 N/A GBR 9/23/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002559994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58232
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AHMUT v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF AHMUT v. THE NETHERLANDS 21702/93 N/A NLD 11/28/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 1982 Aliens Circular Chapters A4 paras. 3.3 and 5.1.1.1 and B19 paras. 1.1 1.2 2.1.2.1 and 2.1.2 Aliens Act sections 6 1 7 8 9 11 1 and 2 13 22 29 1 and 2 31 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1128JUD002170293https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58002
CASE OF AKDİVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKD VAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 21893/93 N/A TUR 9/16/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0916JUD002189393https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58062
CASE OF AKSOY v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKSOY v. TURKEY 21987/93 N/A TUR 12/18/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 25 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1218JUD002198793https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58003
CASE OF AKTAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKTA v. TURKEY 24351/94 N/A TUR 4/24/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Violation of Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0424JUD002435194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61055
CASE OF AL-JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 27021/08 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Regulation No. 1 of the Coalition Provisional Authority 293 210 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002702108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105612
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF AMUUR v. FRANCE
CASE OF AMUUR v. FRANCE 19776/92 N/A FRA 6/25/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0625JUD001977692https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57988