Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 582
14. Agreement establishing the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 14. Agreement establishing the Fund for the Development of the Indigenous Peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean Madrid 24 July 1992 Entry into force : 4 August 1993 in accordance with UNIV-14https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-14&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
Alberto Velásquez Echeverri v. Colombia
Alberto Vel squez Echeverri v. Colombia CCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017 Communication number s : 2931/2017 Author: Alberto Vel squez Echeverri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Colombia Submission date 01 Aug 2016 Date of decision 21 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2931/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2863/en-US
Alger v. Australia
Alger v. Australia CCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013 Communication number s : 2237/2013 Author: Christopher Alger Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Australia Submission date 30 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2017 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2237/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2315/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF AÏT-MOUHOUB v. FRANCE
CASE OF A T MOUHOUB v. FRANCE 22924/93 N/A FRA 10/28/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards first complaint Violation of Art. 6 1 as regards second complaint Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002292493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58259
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9214/80 9473/81 9474/81 N/A GBR 5/28/1985 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 8 Violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1985:0528JUD000921480https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57416
CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE
CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE 19248/91 N/A FRA 11/21/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 76 41 101 406 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1121JUD001924891 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE Application no. 19248/91 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 21 November 1995 In ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1121JUD001924891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57950
CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA 8269/78 N/A AUT 3/26/1982 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 Austrian Penal Code Section 42 445 136 70 325 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ADOLF v. AUSTRIA Application no. 8269/78 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1982:0326JUD000826978https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57417
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388
CASE OF AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE 14807/89 N/A GRC 10/24/1995 12:00:00 AM Not necessary to examine preliminary objection ratione temporis Preliminary objection allowed victim Lack of jurisdiction complaint inadmissible new complaint Civil Code ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1024JUD001480789https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57951
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AHMED AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22954/93 N/A GBR 9/2/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 11 No violation of P1 3 Local Government and Housing Act 1989 sections 1 5 2 2 2 3 Schedule to the Local Government Officers ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0902JUD002295493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58222
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 18465/91 N/A GBR 5/5/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 139 1 and 5 141 1 142 152 Schedule 3 paras. 6 7 and 16 1952 Act on customs 1876 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0505JUD001846591https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57939
CASE OF AIREY v. IRELAND
CASE OF AIREY v. IRELAND 6289/73 N/A IRL 10/9/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 8 Just satisfaction reserved 14 128 445 136 41 164 343 100 451 425 203 444 110 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:1009JUD000628973 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF AIREY v. IRELAND ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:1009JUD000628973https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57420
CASE OF AKDİVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AKD VAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 21893/93 N/A TUR 9/16/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0916JUD002189393https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58062