Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 988
CASE OF BOUCHELKIA v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUCHELKIA v. FRANCE 23078/93 N/A FRA 1/29/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Civil Code Article 21 27 Law no. 80 9 of 10 January 1980 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 as amended concerning the conditions of entry and residence of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0129JUD002307893https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58014
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUGHANEMI v. FRANCE 22070/93 N/A FRA 4/24/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 sections 19 22 25 Law no. 81 973 of 29 October 1981 Law no. 86 1025 of 9 September 1986 Law no. 89 548 of 2 August 1989 Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0424JUD002207093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57991
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOUJLIFA v. FRANCE 25404/94 N/A FRA 10/21/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 concerning the conditions of entry and residence of aliens in France as modified by Laws no. 80 9 of 10 January 1980 no. 81 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1021JUD002540494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58106
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BOWMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24839/94 N/A GBR 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Violation of Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002483994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58134
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA 11170/84 12876/87 13468/87 N/A AUT 8/28/1991 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 6 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 d No violation of Art. 6 3 c Pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0828JUD001117084https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57683
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRANNIGAN AND McBRIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 14553/89 14554/89 N/A GBR 5/26/1993 12:00:00 AM Derogation of Art. 5 3 satisfies the requirements of Art. 15 No violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 13 Prevention of Terrorism Temporary Provisions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001455389https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57819
CASE OF BRIGANDÌ v. ITALY
CASE OF BRIGAND v. ITALY 11460/85 N/A ITA 2/19/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Damage financial award 369 304 445 40 406 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001146085 In the Brigand case The European Court of Human Rights sitting in accordance withArticle ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0219JUD001146085https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57654
CASE OF BRINCAT v. ITALY
CASE OF BRINCAT v. ITALY 13867/88 N/A ITA 11/26/1992 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1126JUD001386788https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57769
CASE OF BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY LTD v. THE NETHERLANDS 19589/92 N/A NLD 11/20/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No separate issue under P1 1 Act concerning administrative jurisdiction as to decisions of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1120JUD001958992https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57953
CASE OF BRONDA v. ITALY
CASE OF BRONDA v. ITALY 22430/93 N/A ITA 6/9/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Civil Code Article 333 Code of Civil Procedure Article 373 451 203 425 268 376 238 444 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093 CASE OF BRONDA ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002243093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58194
CASE OF BRUALLA GÓMEZ DE LA TORRE v. SPAIN
CASE OF BRUALLA G MEZ DE LA TORRE v. SPAIN 26737/95 ESP 12/19/1997 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Transitional provision no. 2 of Law no. 10/92 of 30 April 1992 which ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1219JUD002673795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58127
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BRYAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 19178/91 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 sections 172 174 2 175 3 289 Planning Inspectorate Executive Agency Framework Document 1992 Town and Country Planning ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD001917891https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57954
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BUCKLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20348/92 N/A GBR 9/25/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 sections 77 78 and 80 Circular 28 77 Department of the Environment of 25 March 1977 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0925JUD002034892https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58076
CASE OF BULUT v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF BULUT v. AUSTRIA 17358/90 N/A AUT 2/22/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established by law impartiality hearing Violation of Art. 6 1 equality of arms Damage claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0222JUD001735890https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57971
CASE OF BUNKATE v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF BUNKATE v. THE NETHERLANDS 13645/88 N/A NLD 5/26/1993 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage claim dismissed 445 406 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001364588 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF BUNKATE v. THE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0526JUD001364588https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57820
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 16213/90 N/A CHE 2/22/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected victim Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 14 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Costs and expenses partial award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0222JUD001621390https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57865
CASE OF BUSCARINI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
CASE OF BUSCARINI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO 24645/94 SMR 2/18/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses claim dismissed Elections Act Law no. 36 of 1958 section 55 Decree of 27 June 1909 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0218JUD002464594https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58915
CASE OF C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20190/92 N/A GBR 11/22/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 7 1 Sexual Offences Amendment Act 1976 section 1 1 a Court of Appeal Criminal Division R. v. R. judgment of 14 March 1991 1991 2 All England Law Reports 257 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1122JUD002019092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57955
CASE OF C. v. BELGIUM
CASE OF C. v. BELGIUM 21794/93 N/A BEL 8/7/1996 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 8 Constitution Article 6 Act of 15 December 1980 on the entry residence settlement and expulsion of aliens sections 20 21 62 and 69 Minister of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0807JUD002179493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57992