Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 101 - 120 of 807
CASE OF CIULLA v. ITALY
CASE OF CIULLA v. ITALY 11152/84 N/A ITA 2/22/1989 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies estoppel Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 5 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0222JUD001115284https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57460
CASE OF CIVET v. FRANCE
CASE OF CIVET v. FRANCE 29340/95 FRA 9/28/1999 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction complaint inadmissible Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 567 591 592 and 593 Cass. Crim. 20 October 1987 Bull. Crim. no. 356 12 April 1995 appeal no. 95 80 328 Cass. Crim. 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928JUD002934095https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58307
CASE OF COLAK v. GERMANY
CASE OF COLAK v. GERMANY 9999/82 DEU 12/6/1988 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1206JUD000999982 In the Colak case Note by the Registrar: The case is numbered 15/1987/138/192. The second figure indicates the year in which the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1206JUD000999982https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57461
CASE OF CONTRADA v. ITALY
CASE OF CONTRADA v. ITALY 27143/95 N/A ITA 8/24/1998 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 Code of Criminal Procedure CCP Article 273 1 Article 274 Article 275 3 as amended by Legislative Decree no. 152 of 1991 which became Law no. 203 of 1991 and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0824JUD002714395https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58217
CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10843/84 N/A GBR 9/27/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 12 451 429 203 319 450 240 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0927JUD001084384 COURT PLENARY CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0927JUD001084384https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57641
CASE OF COSTELLO-ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COSTELLO ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13134/87 N/A GBR 3/25/1993 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 Education Act 1944 Sections 70 75 114 1 Children Act 1989 Education Act 1980 Section 17 Children s ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0325JUD001313487https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57804
CASE OF COYNE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COYNE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25942/94 GBR 9/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Air Force Act 1955 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0924JUD002594294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58097
CASE OF CRUZ VARAS AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF CRUZ VARAS AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 15576/89 N/A SWE 3/20/1991 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 25 1 350 492 193 192 451 425 183 498 308 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0320JUD001557689 COURT PLENARY CASE OF CRUZ VARAS ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0320JUD001557689https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57674
CASE OF CUCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CUCU v. ROMANIA 22362/06 POPESCU N. ROU 11/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD002236206https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114516
CASE OF CUTEAN v. ROMANIA
CASE OF CUTEAN v. ROMANIA 53150/12 CHIRITA R. ROU 12/2/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing 445 76 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD005315012 THIRD SECTION CASE OF CUTEAN v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1202JUD005315012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148277
CASE OF D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 30240/96 N/A GBR 5/2/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 No violation of Art. 13 Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Immigration Act 1971 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0502JUD003024096https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58035
CASE OF DALBAN v. ROMANIA
CASE OF DALBAN v. ROMANIA 28114/95 N/A ROU 9/28/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Criminal Code Article 206 183 498 234 149 148 201 265 579 238 445 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0928JUD002811495https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58306
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCE
CASE OF DALIA v. FRANCE 26102/95 N/A FRA 2/19/1998 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 3 Public Health Code Article L. 630 1 Ordinance no. 45 2658 of 2 November 1945 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD002610295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58130
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF DAUD v. PORTUGAL 22600/93 PRT 4/21/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 6 3 c Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 e Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 445 76 136 440 86 162 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093 CASE OF DAUD v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0421JUD002260093https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58154
CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM 9186/80 N/A BEL 10/26/1984 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Just satisfaction reserved 445 136 180 70 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM Application no. 9186/80 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57465
CASE OF DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE 12964/87 N/A FRA 12/16/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1216JUD001296487https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57778
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 19983/92 N/A BEL 2/24/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0224JUD001998392https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58015
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 6/18/1971 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 4 No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1971:0618JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57606
CASE OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
CASE OF DE WILDE OOMS AND VERSYP v. BELGIUM ARTICLE 50 2832/66 2835/66 2899/66 N/A BEL 3/10/1972 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0310JUD000283266https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57607
CASE OF DELCOURT v. BELGIUM
CASE OF DELCOURT v. BELGIUM 2689/65 N/A BEL 1/17/1970 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 6 1 445 136 119 70 388 180 181 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0117JUD000268965 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF DELCOURT v. BELGIUM Application no. 2689/65 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 January 1970 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0117JUD000268965https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57467