Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 7127
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003 Communication number s : 1233/2003 Author: A. K. and A. R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Jul 2003 Date of decision 31 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1015/en-US
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark
A.M.D. et al. v. Denmark CAT/C/60/D/653/2015 Communication number s : 653/2015 Author: A.M.D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Dec 2014 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/653/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3429/en-US
A.N. v. Burundi
A.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/612/2014 Communication number s : 612/2014 Author: A.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 24 Mar 2014 Date of decision 02 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/612/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3018/en-US
A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Freedom of religion and freedom of association: Breach on account of the banning of the applicant organisations symbols followed by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58677
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.R.I. v. Denmark
A.R.I. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015 Communication number s : 096/2015 Author: A.R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2652/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A.S. v. Jamaica
A.S. v. Jamaica CCPR/C/36/D/231/1987 Communication number s : 231/1987 Author: A.S. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Jamaica Submission date 07 Jun 1987 Date of decision 21 Jul 1989 Comment: The author s JUTBCCPR/C/36/D/231/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/698/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A v. Netherlands
A v. Netherlands CAT/C/21/D/91/1997 Communication number s : 091/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Oct 1997 Date of decision 13 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/91/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/239/en-US
ABBAS v. France
ABBAS v. France FRA 20/10/2000 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:02:39 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to a three year exclusion order concerning an Algerian national. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32062
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine
ABRAMOV v. Ukraine UKR 10/10/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or controlled by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25317
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124