Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 792
11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 18 January 2002 in UNIV-11-chttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.B.V. v. Russia
A.B.V. v. Russia RUS 02/01/2019 00:00:00 24/01/2019 10:13:38 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51193
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
ANTOFIE v. Romania
ANTOFIE v. Romania ROU 25/06/2014 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:30:01 Case Description: Denial of access to court: Intended legal action declared void by a domestic court on the ground of non payment of the stamp duty ordered without examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17431
Aboufaied v. Libya
Aboufaied v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008 Communication number s : 1782/2008 Author: Tahar Mohamed Aboufaied Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 05 Apr 2008 Date of decision 21 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1364/en-US
Ad hoc Report on Greece (Rule 34)
Ad hoc Report on Greece Rule 34 GRC 2019 12 06 2019 12 18 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Public Publication: 18 December 2019 Greco AdHocRep 2019 2 Ad hoc Report on GREECE Rule 34 Adopted by GRECO at its 84th Plenary Meeting Strasbourg 2 6 December 2019 I. GRECOGreco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-AdHocRep(2019)2-FINAL-eng-Greece-PUBLIC
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan
Almas Kusherbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011 Communication number s : 2027/2011 Author: Almas Kusherbaev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 Sep 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/2027/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1278/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BEGU v. Romania
BEGU v. Romania ROU 15/06/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of property: Lack of sufficient justification for continued detention on remand and failure to decide on the applicant s demand for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16321
BERARU v. Romania
BERARU v. Romania ROU 08/09/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the applicant s right to a fair trial due to an irregularity in the composition of the panel of the first instance court the limited access of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13312
Belyazeka v. Belarus
Belyazeka v. Belarus CCPR/C/104/D/1772/2008 Communication number s : 1772/2008 Author: Syargei Belyazeka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Feb 2008 Date of decision 23 Mar 2012 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1772/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1508/en-US
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain E/C.12/61/D/5/2015 Communication number s : 005/2015 Author: Mohamed Ben Djazia and Naouel Bellili Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Spain Submission date 20 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Jun 2017 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/61/D/5/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2407/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF ABDURAKHMANOVA AND ABDULGAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABDURAKHMANOVA AND ABDULGAMIDOVA v. RUSSIA 41437/10 EHRAC/MEMORIAL HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE RUS 9/22/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0922JUD004143710https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157372
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687