Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 4796
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
A. R. A. v. Sweden
A. R. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/38/D/305/2006 Communication number s : 305/2006 Author: A. R. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 38 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Sep 2006 Date of decision 30 Apr 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/38/D/305/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/100/en-US
A. R. and A. A. v. Canada
A. R. and A. A. v. Canada CAT/C/72/D/898/2018 Communication number s : 898/2018 Author: A. R. and A. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2018 Date of decision 03 Dec 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/72/D/898/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3112/en-US
A.R. v. Netherlands
A.R. v. Netherlands CAT/C/31/D/203/2002 Communication number s : 203/2002 Author: A.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Mar 2002 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/31/D/203/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/159/en-US
A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy
A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. v. Italy CCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017 Communication number s : 3042/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Italy Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3042/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3275/en-US
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark,Italy
A.S.M. and R.A.H. v. Denmark Italy CCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014 Communication number s : 2378/2014 Author: A.S.M. and R.A.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Italy Submission date 14 Apr 2014 Date of decision 07 Jul 2016 JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2378/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2245/en-US
A.S. and L.S. v. Australia
A.S. and L.S. v. Australia CCPR/C/47/D/490/1992 Communication number s : 490/1992 Author: A.S. and L.S. names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 47 Country Australia Submission date 26 Dec 1991 Date of decision 30 Mar 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/47/D/490/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/498/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland
A.Sh. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/717/2015 Communication number s : 717/2015 Author: A.Sh. et al. represented by counsel Angela Stettler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 25 Nov 2015 Date of JUTBCAT/C/63/D/717/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2730/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.W.P v. Denmark
A.W.P v. Denmark CCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009 Communication number s : 1879/2009 Author: A.W.P Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 109 Country Denmark Submission date 26 Mar 2009 Date of decision 01 Nov 2013 Comment: The text of an individual JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1879/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1678/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AZERBAIJAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/AZE/CO/3 NULL 2021 11 02T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/AZE/CO/3 International Convention on the Distr.: General 2 November 2021 Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Original: English Members of UHRICMW/C/AZE/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/810bc6b3-220e-49c4-b27f-bc6094ebb6a1
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands
Aalbersberg et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005 Communication number s : 1440/2005 Author: Aalbersberg and 2 084 other Dutch citizens Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Aug 2005 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1440/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1291/en-US