Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 861 - 880 of 1327
E.J. et al. v. Azerbaijan,Sweden
E.J. et al. v. Azerbaijan Sweden CAT/C/41/D/306/2006 Communication number s : 306/2006 Author: E. J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Azerbaijan Sweden Submission date 24 Oct 2006 Date of decision 14 Nov 2008 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/41/D/306/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/77/en-US
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
Esenbek Ukteshbaev v. Kazakhstan
Esenbek Ukteshbaev v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2420/2014 Communication number s : 2420/2014 Author: Esenbek Ukteshbaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 10 Mar 2014 Date of decision 17 Jul 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2420/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2788/en-US
Evaluation Report Bosnia and Herzegovina
Evaluation Report Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 2022 12 02 2023 03 09 Adoption: 2 December 2022 Publication: 9 March 2023 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2022 8 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2022-8-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-BiH-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2022-8-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-BiH-PUBLIC
Evgeny Pugach v. Belarus
Evgeny Pugach v. Belarus CCPR/C/114/D/1984/2010 Communication number s : 1984/2010 Author: Evgeny Pugach Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Belarus Submission date 13 Mar 2010 Date of decision 15 Jul 2015 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/1984/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1982/en-US
Evloev v. Kazakhstan
Evloev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/51/D/441/2010 Communication number s : 441/2010 Author: Oleg Evloev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 20 Dec 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/51/D/441/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/5/en-US
F.A. v. France
F.A. v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2662/2015 Communication number s : 2662/2015 Author: F.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 18 Jun 2015 Date of decision 16 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2662/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2548/en-US
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
F.H.A. v. Denmark
F.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016 Communication number s : 108/2016 Author: F.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2704/en-US
F.J. et al. v. Australia
F.J. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013 Communication number s : 2233/2013 Author: F.J. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 03 Dec 2012 Date of decision 22 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2233/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3092/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
F.O.F. v. Brazil
F.O.F. v. Brazil CRPD/C/23/D/40/2017 Communication number s : 40/2017 Author: F.O.F. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 23 Country Brazil Submission date 21 Dec 2016 Date of decision 02 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/23/D/40/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3071/en-US
FABER v. Hungary
FABER v. Hungary HUN 24/10/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of the imposition of a fine for displaying a flag with controversial historical connotations in protest against an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10521
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan
FATULLAYEV v. Azerbaijan AZE 04/10/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of expression violations of Article 10 of the applicant journalists due in particular in both cases to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1727
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT UNITED KINGDOM
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT UNITED KINGDOM GBR 2017 12 08 2018 05 17 Adoption: 8 December 2017 Publication: 17 May 2018 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-1-Final-eng-UK-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-1-Final-eng-UK-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of Members of Parliament, Judges and Prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SWITZERLAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of Members of Parliament Judges and Prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SWITZERLAND CHE 2016 12 02 2017 03 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval-4Rep-2016-5-eng-final-EVAL4-Switzerland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval-4Rep-2016-5-eng-final-EVAL4-Switzerland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT ESTONIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT ESTONIA EST 2015 03 27 2015 04 17 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Estonia to GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-1E-Final-Estonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-1E-Final-Estonia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT SLOVAK REPUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT SLOVAK REPUBLIC SVK 2015 10 16 2015 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-7E-Final-Slovakia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-7E-Final-Slovakia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT TURKEY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT TURKEY TUR 2017 10 18 2018 03 15 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Turkey to GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-16-Final-eng-Turkey-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-16-Final-eng-Turkey-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ANDORRA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ANDORRA AND 2017 06 23 2017 11 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-8-eng-Final-Andorra-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-8-eng-Final-Andorra-PUBLIC